Yeah, but Obama would still feed his mother a dead-rat sandwich, if he thought it would increase his popularity.

Quit making phony excuses. They have no puppet strings, no one controls their choices, but for themselves.
No one forced the neck of a bottle down their throat. It IS A CHOICE and the courts will always see it that way. In fact the only people who don't see it that way are those who profit from the false assertion; drunks and liberal behavoralists who have about as much credibility as a Puerto Rican wart healer. So, WRONG ANSWER.

          Someone who impaired themselves with ALWAYS be at fault. Therefore, we eliminate the problem through culturecide. We kill off the drunks as they cross the line to dangerous. Before would be better, but we have to give them a chance to destroy innocent lives before we turn them to useful fertilizer. Therein lie the drunks just chance. You wanna hear something stupid? Record and play back your bullshit.

          Sounds to me like you default to whatever cartoon drama your brains can handle.....

Dumbass, that's like saying " my car has a flat tire, so I must accept it".

            You must actually get off your ass, out of the car and DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT.
Accept it, jeez, what a total fucking idiot.

Jane you ignorant slut, the calibration must be set to rid the roads of self chosen hazards to save the innocent. That's lives, not some self-reserved right. Get your priorities in order before you come swinging your liberal hemorrhoids around here.

You know what's really cool? We mail in our votes at my house and my wife lets me fill out her ballot. I vote twice!

So far, along with mystified researchers in Marijuana states, you are unable to prove that marijuana ingestion leads to unsafe driving. Google it.
Let me get this straight, you're gonna hop-a-cunticle on my cock, sucker? God ,you public school grads will just service anything that moves, won't you?

Yup, that is some tech that would help.
Nope, it's o.k. to sacrifice the incompetent in MOST ANY circumstance.
I don't recall any constitutional print that read that we have to sacrifice OUR rights to protect some personally reserved right.
For instance if I reserved the right to stand outside bars, sorting out the unable to drive, disabling their abilities with extreme prejudice and then charging them for my time; I would have to defend that right by retreating at the first sign of those come to oppress me, and run from the cops.
Some just don't understand reserved rights.

Nope, just those willing to make the choice to endanger others with their driving.
Quit pouting.

Nope, one party system.
You got the Demopican from looking at the rectal end of the animal.

Both wings of the Repubmocrat party sing that song EVERY election. The majority buy it every time and we have had a Repubmocrat in office, sucking our lifeforce out, for more than a century now.

Over tired, doesn't have the ability to test.
Driving drunk, has a test.
Build a machine that does what you say, then run your mouth. Perhaps one that will sense tired, give you a few minutes to situate, then shut off the car for an amount of time.
While you're at it build one that shuts off cell phones, stifles passengers, repels idiots and forces your wife and kids to check the fluids once a week.
Meanwhile, drunks who drive just need put down.

Neither, in fact, you may feel free to admire me.
In our country of misplaced justice, we tend to lock up the non-dangerous in large numbers, while the dangerous get all sorts of legal gold stars during the enforcement phase, to get out early, to indulge in recidivism. No ones problem is solved.
We merely take the most dangerous, the most recidivistic and delete them, saving enough money to deal with those not so dangerous and eliminate prison overcrowding, making it a safer place to rehabilitate the able.
We have no use for the dangerous, who, either gave up their humanity or never had it to begin with. No real loss, no moral conflict and no credit to the morally retarded who hold us all in jeopardy and debt, trying to keep the scumbags among us alive to continue to feed off us.

At one time testing showed me to be amongst the top 4% of minds on the planet.
Perhaps I work from far more detailed criteria than you. Don't feel bad, at least your brain works well enough to cogitate the subject in a rudimentary way.

Well when you can separate the undrunk from the drunk , then we will worry about the morality of it. Meanwhile, lives are at stake and nobody gives a damn about your nearly innocent- nearly drunks.
Suck it up buddy.

They chose to be impaired, so YES they used up their choice.
Victims of drunks had no choice. So drunks should have no choice in being killed for killing.
After I stopped and thought about it a bit, it still sounds too nice without torturing the drunk for days before you tire of him and end his worthless life.

Playing GTA5 only puts the choice before you.
Alcohol shouldn't be illegal either, driving drunk should remove your license to drive forever, and drunk driving that kills should end the drunks life forever as well.
We CAN improve society by eliminating those who kill by drunk .
There is no given, that not being able to drive causes crime. If you choose not to adapt to your new , low station in life and commit a crime, then pay for your crime. If there is an undue burden on the state to process a vast bulk of prisoners, then, ACLU be damned, the road gangs need be started back up to make sure the prisoners have enough funds to eat while in prison, have heat, guards, light and all the expenses that they incur because we LET THEM LIVE preserved ,away from societies murderous hate for them. Yup, forced labor is better than bread and water in an unheated cell.
Road crews, farm crews, scrap crews, there are all kinds of jobs for a prisoner with a shotgun on head and a chain on his ankle. We should do this regardless of the outcome of drunk laws.

It's reasonable to take away their lives and freedom before they do the same by driving drunk and killing again.
No death? O.K. take away their license and they can be free to struggle to live without personal transportation, big fuckin deal.
Criminals because of limited transportation? More than half the world doesn't own a car and probably doesn't drive on either.
No excuses. If you are a criminal, pay the price just like any other day. So, probably best just to kill the ones that hurt or kill others and hope the would be criminals adjust to the brave new world. If not, lay one on top of the other so it only uses one bullet to kill both and save the cost of ammo.