Essentially you're saying that a German citizen can only freely express themselves in a way the government deems appropriate.
I think you miss the essential point here: Germany was fortunately liberated in 1944/45 by the Allies. The Allies enforced the process of Denazification, which envolved several actions, first and foremost the removal of Nazi symbolism of official buildings, renaming of streets and places which the Nazis had given names of their own (mostly Hitler's). The Allies were keen to prevent any uprising of Nazi terror once and for all. So, since 1949, the year when both German states were founded, the Germans (in the West as well as in the East) decided to make it a prime directive of their policy to keep fascism down. So, your freedom of speech in Germany is protected by the state, as long as you do not praise Nazism or deny the existence of the Holocaust. That's it. And the reason is not censorship as such, but a very special, mostly German and Austrian, responsibility to keep a promise that was given after 1945: not to let facism rise a again on German soil.
From what I can tell Germany's general legislation seems to be more of a "Think of the children!" rather then focused on liberty.
The fact that children aren't allowed to buy/consume things that adults may, is a quite different discussion. For example, people under 18 aren't allowed to consume pornography as well as hard alcoholic beverages (beer is allowed for everyone under 17, hey they're the Germans
Nazi symbolism is forbidden for any German, regardless of age, sex, profession, belief, etc. It may only depicted for educational reasons (museums or historic textbooks, as far as I know). The spreading of "Mein Kampf", Hitler's first book, is for example not forbidden by the state, but of the current copyright holder.
By the way: Have you ever been Germany or Europe, at least?
You're not as far off the deutschmark as you think.
There, fixed that for you.
I've said it once and I'll say it again: Germany is not a free country.
Alright. Let's have a look at the German constitution (Grundgesetz, basic law, they call it). I retrieved an official English translation for it via Wikipedia, quote:
As every governmental decision has to obey to this fundamental rule, why should Germany not be "a free country"?
What you say about Nazis is in fact not true. It's quite the opposite: If you spread Nazi ideology you may soon face some time in jail, but not if you protest against neo-Nazism. The censorship of videogames is mainly related to a certain law which forbids to show Nazi-symbols, like the swastika. So, if you want to sell a game there, leave them out, and it can be sold. How could law differentiate between videogames and propaganda posters and allow video games to show those symbols while keeping neo-Nazi propaganda from doing so?
I'd say you depict Germany in a really distorted way. Deducting non-freedom from special Nazi-related laws is a little far fetched, imho.
Vandalism is pretty much part of the tradition.
Frankly, I object to "traditions" that allow anyone to wreck my front door. Also, "vandalism" is not my tradition.
You have to keep watch and throw rocks at them if they try to rape your doorknob or smash your pumpkins. Never aim at the head though.
I also refuse to hurt children, even if they "smash my pumpkins". There are better ways to deal with that.
So, if I'm caught by costumed kids at home, I'll share some of my sweets (no, I am not a pinhead
There is a simple signal used here in the states: leave your porch lights on if you are giving out candy. Turn them off if you are not.
Trouble is, the "continental European version" of Halloween, as I exeperienced it so far, has been stripped of everything but ringing at everybody's home to gather sweets while wearing costumes. I am nearly 100% sure, that not any kid will know that rule around here. Still, what they know is that on Halloween, people who do not open their door, get their knobs or doorbells coated with toothpaste.
Participation in the Halloween extortion scheme is not mandatory.
Right. That's exactly my point. Most kids around here don't care for that one. Globalization would be so fine, if imported customs would not be that distorted
In that case, I guess it would come down to the quality and availability of your home internet connection.
ADSL, 16MBit/s downstream, 1MBit/s upstream. Should be sufficient for any streaming purposes
Other than that, yeah, I can't think of why the university does it.
OK, to be more precise, I am not a professor, but a post-graduate giving lectures. The professor holding the chair I am working for is responsible for this strange situation. Nevertheless, he is quite representative for a decent number of other professors when it comes to working from home. D'oh.
If you worked from home, wouldn't every professor have to have the internet line and video equipment that the campus has?
You suppose that we do our lectures using video streams. Actually, the largest group of our students is working full-time (either because they can't afford a full-time university or because they want to get a further diploma to qualify for a different position in their firm) and therefore is quite happy with our printed materials. Only very few professors actually use video streaming (and this only on few occasions), so that our campus only requires one TV studio.
So, a computer, a phone, a decent internet connection (ADSL/cable) and some space on your desk would be all to manage your tasks from home. Needless to say that nearly all of us have a university-sponsored laptop and handheld computer. But actually, most of us ask ourselves why as a remote working place is not favored
East (&technically West) Germany
Yes, I know, I am doing the smart ass thing right now, but the Federal Republic of Germany we know right now has technically existed since 1949. There have several occasions where the (you say West) German state has significantly changed. For example in 1957, a small independent country joined the German Federation. Furthermore, my home country integrated numerous smaller areas from its western neighbours (Belgium, Netherlands, Luxembourg) as well as some North Sea islands between 1949 and the 1970s. So if you say, that we have a different state every time some minor areal changes took place, then counting them all will become a rather difficult task
UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. -- Doug Gwyn