Comment Re:Yes, manual flight much better! (Score 1) 270
Read the comments on CNN. Most of the best one-liners from "Airplane" are there.
Nice for a morning laugh
Read the comments on CNN. Most of the best one-liners from "Airplane" are there.
Nice for a morning laugh
Correct, an orbit is a lot harder than just achieving an altitude.
I do however, disagree with you about the conclusion you are trying to prove with your analogy.
If you have never built any sort of a vehicle before, evolving from the toy stage through many many many steps to a formula 1 car may actually be a logical process, and therefore is relevant.
Likewise, a progression from earthbound to an orbiting space station and beyond, may include a developmental step of placing a monkey in a missile.
Cheers
Kenny
IANAL
Canada indeed has a couple laws that would be relevant
Most relevant, The Criminal Code section 342 "Unauthorized use of Computer" http://www.efc.ca/pages/law/cc/cc.342.1.html.
This criminal code section is subject to colour of right, meaning if you have permission from the system owner to perform testing, this section and owning the tools to perform this section become OK. If however you do not have permission, the investigation into this breach could expose other CCofC violations probably section 430 "Mischief", Section 351 "Possession of Break-in instruments",. as well as something from sections 354-360 which are the possessions of proceeds of crime sections.
Side note, don't break-in using any technique that involves intercepting someones communications (eavesdropping, man-in-the-middle) as that falls under privacy laws (CCofC 183-196) which are much more strict and can't be waived by the system owner, only by the sender or recipient of the communication.
IANAL, but for this case I would say the first time he found the vulnerability, there was no intent to commit the crime, he stumbled across it. The second time he was checking the other system to see if the flaw was there which seems like an unauthorized use of computer system. If he had asked the system owner (or manufacturer I suppose) if he could perform tests to ensure the flaw in the system would not be made worse by his code or his system would not be affected by the flaw, he would have been on better legal footing.
and once more IANAL
Cheers
Kenny
CCofC = Criminal Code of Canada
IANAL = I Am Not A Lawyer
Running an anti-virus does not provide 100% protection, it does however provide infinite times as much protection as not running one.
I wonder what the impact on ride quality would be when you pick up a large piece of metallic debris, like say an exhaust system that rusted off.
This wouldn't happen often, but would be interesting when it did.
Kenny
According to the Jargon file 37 is the most random number.
http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/R/random-numbers.html
Kenny
Yup, if you dont want people to know the information, dont post it publicly. Seems simple enough to me.
So if I don't want to get stalked I... shouldn't go outside?
Or connect to networks. But wait, aren't networks Cisco's business? Perhaps they are just after the exhibitionist market.
Step aside, or I'll have to use my telepathetic powers.
You would have just thrown the Cannon copier into a Star Trek Logic Bomb death spiral. Your post talks about reproduction and RPGs. Does not compute....
I have done a little research on the effects a hot girl's boobs have and indeed for most males there are some outwardly observable signs.
Upon closer examination a typo was found in proposition 8 that limits marriage to being between one man and one wolfman.
http://www.theonion.com/content/news_briefs/typo_in_proposition_8
Arithmetic is being able to count up to twenty without taking off your shoes. -- Mickey Mouse