Good catch. You must be very concerned about ethics in games journalism.

Used to be you could get a plow attachment for your jeep.

Negro hair-straightener recipes too. Plus a million other toxic "remedies" made with reagents you need a federal license to secure these days.

I wonder if they'll be as strict as the FBI about not hiring people who've "pirated" music or TV shows.

Mineral oil was the first thing I thought of as well.

The shooter had a known history of drug abuse.

If nothing else, maybe we can at least slashdot 'em.

Yeah, my bad. Sorry about that. I hadn't had time to really process exactly how stupid that site was before I hit submit, and would remove it from the submission if that was at all possible. I apologize for that supreme fuckup, and offer you this much more compelling piece (which I should have linked to instead.) https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Many of the people dropping bombs and firing hellfire missiles TODAY are Christians of one stripe or another. In a large part, they are the root cause of this jihad.

You may be correct that the summary is a little misleading, but I think C-13 is only addressed in one of the 3 main stories linked. Preventative detention & making certain forms of speech illegal are new ideas, as far as I understand, and are separate responses. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong - I'm just a guy stuck in Costa Rica trying to make sense of this all from afar.

You got a source on that? I want to check it! (not calling you out - genuinely interested)

It's not even the weasel words (though there are many.) It's the fact the constitution doesn't really exist and so the government/courts can declare it to be basically whatever they want whenever they want. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U...

Careful now, under the new legislation those words could land you in jail.

Even though they're completely true.

You don't have to be cynical - they are totally upfront about the fact that they had these already written and were just waiting for the right time. Hell, they boast about it, as though it makes the legislation better.

Thanks for the kind words. I realize now that I forgot to mention it in the submission, but as a Canadian I was surprised to find that the very best analysis of this current situation came from Russel Brand, who I'd honestly never watched before, but was overwhelmingly prescient in his analysis (even if he does bounce about like a caffeinated meth head) https://www.youtube.com/watch?...