Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment This is a bad thing? (Score 1) 398

The switch to non-paper, non-printed records must be accelerated, if anything. We must be able to forget the past and move forward.

Too many things in the past are inconvenient, unpleasant, ugly, and horrid. Many mistakes were made, even by right-thinking and well-intentioned people. It serves no purpose to those memories and regrets.

There are a lot of things that are best forgotten: The Holocaust, the Crusades, George Bush, The fall of the Soviet Union, et cetera.

If there must be a past, then change it into something better. Rewrite it and make all the bad things go away. It is very easy as long as everything is not printed.

Perhaps there might be a true record kept but it should not be made public, accessible to the masses. It will serve no good purpose for the masses to know the truth and inconvenient for the leadership. It will only serve to hinder progress with needless comparisons and deceptions.

Eliminate paper, keep everything on computers where anything can be kept hidden or changed as necessary to serve our enlightened leaders' purposes.

Actually, NOT! Keeping everything on computers is a really , really stupid idea.

Security

Submission + - Bank of America's Online Banking secure--naw!

slashdotard writes: What would you call a bank that was lazy about renewing it's ssl certificates?

What would you call a bank that fails to properly install ssl certificates.

I think I'd call it Bank of America.

Nearly every year, the bank allows it's ssl certificates to expire and either does not renew them right away or waits a week or so to install a new one.

But this year they went one farther by failing to install their certificate chain properly. Users are apparently presented with an intermediate certificate, not the end certificate that is supposed to identify the website. It seems they ignored Verisign's new (as of April 2006?) policy of double-signing certificates.

So how many users will ignore the invalid certificate and log in to the website?
I'd bet a lot would.

So why bother with ssl at all, in that case?

Slashdot Top Deals

"God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh." - Voltaire

Working...