With quotations it's a well known fact that the longer ago they were invented the truer they are
Incorrect.
For example there was a story written thousands of years ago. It says the Earth was created out of nothing by a bearded man in a white dress and it took him six days. All that happened a few thousand years before the story was written.
Nobody is mad enough to believe that.
It looks like they had tied their bank accounts directly to their Warhammer accounts, without any debit card in the middle.
Mmmm, isn't that how a debit card works?
Three different reasons given:
1. I have nothing to hide, so why not share everything with everyone?
2. My privacy settings are on, so it's okay.
3. I don't care, I want to keep in touch with my friends that live in the same dorm that I also text obsessively and eat every meal with.
My generation is as anti-privacy as they are anti-copyright; they hate the establishment but love giving said establishment all of their data.
Old "parenting skills": 1) Place child in front of TV. 2) Insert Disney DVD 3) Press "Play". 4) Return in 90 minutes. 5) Repeat.
Old? That's practically futuristic. The old parenting technique goes like this:
Good thing you cite motorists.org rather than some, you know, reputable source?
I'm not sure any domain of the form $someword.com is intrinsically valuable when you can just type $someword into your favorite search engine.
Everywhere in the usa. if you kill a pedestrian with your car , you are at fault, you get manslaughter charges.
O RLY?
Driving legally is neither negligent nor a violation of traffic laws. Ergo, unless you were driving illegally - drunk, speeding, running a red light - it would absolutely NOT be manslaughter.
There seems to be a common misconception around here that if someone is killed, somebody must be guilty of something. But it isn't the case, and it's nothing to do with the judge's discretion or how cute the deceased is.
In short, if there was no intent to injure, no negligence and no recklessness there's no manslaughter. If you're driving within the law (license, sober, roadworthy vehicle etc) then an accident is basically an accident and that's it.
One, your assumption that people automatically want to get out of jury duty is unfounded. Some people have nothing better to do. Some are curious. Some might even have a sense of civic duty. I haven't done it myself but I've been told it's interesting.
Two, I'd rather have 12 dumb ones than one biased one - which is the system countries like France do.
Three, it still isn't the prosecutor who decides, which is what you asserted before.
Finally, anyone who writes crap like "leave your fate in a group" is in no position to call anyone dumb. Good day!
Software production is assumed to be a line function, but it is run like a staff function. -- Paul Licker
