Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Smart enough to milk it? (Score 4, Funny) 502

The big question is will the M$ management be smart enough to milk the 360, or will they kill it off to force everyone onto something new. You would think that people with 360 who subscribe to Xbox Live would be a cash cow, but the M$ management has a long history of screwing its own customers to make them buy something new. I would be surprised if it didn't have Blu-ray support, but I would be more surprised if the system was the least bit open. On the other hand, I don't care. I kept waiting and waiting for 360 or PS3 prices to drop, and I waited so long that I lost interest. Hmmmmm, the yard needs mowing.

Comment Re:Is it that bad? (Score 1) 463

This is CHINA we're talking about here. The United States would never "cancel" degrees or otherwise dictate to colleges/Universities, private or otherwise, what classes or degree plans they can and can't offer. . . .

It's happening in Texas, as the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board ("THECB") is now reviewing majors at state funded universities in Texas and cutting departments that don't graduate enough majors. The axe is not based on not enough students taking your courses, but not enough majors graduating. So, foreign languages are ending up on the chopping block, especially at smaller, regional schools where plenty of students may take a language as a requirement, but almost no one chooses that particular major. It's a shameful, arbitrary approach to determine which programs are more productive, and just another way to cut programs that the current administration doesn't agree with. The THECB commissioners are appointed by the governor, in this case Rick Perry.

Comment Sigh. I hate being late to the party . . . (Score 1) 77

I'm posting this as probably one of the last people who was still using a Palm Pilot. I only recently quit using my Palm Pilot because of the d--n Touchpad that I bought for next to nothing. I'm not in any way an HP fan, but this whole thing has me so disappointed. Let me get this straight, when I finally get ready to upgrade to a smartphone the nice OS that I've grown to love on the tablet that I bought on the cheap is probably dead? Maybe. Are you f--king kidding me? I buy one of your tablets (Thanks, Apotheker!); I grow to love the tablet; the tablet's simple interface which would be perfect for a phone is ALREADY ON A PHONE, BUT HP'S KILLING IT OFF? Maybe? Has anyone on the HP board even tried WebOS? I can almost, almost understand while Carly gutted the calculator line. Almost, since I've been using the same HP 32S for over 20 years, apparently oblivious to planned obsolescence and the need to sell me more s--t. But that's just it, they want to sell me more s--t. Maybe HP is psychologically incapable of making a decent piece of hardware that lasts and doesn't require expensive supplies (HP printer division, I'm talking to you).

I'm now essentially back to Android or iOS after having never considered WebOS until I used it, and it will probably be Android once I find the best phone for the best price which doesn't have too annoying a skin on it. Of course, since I'm not buying Apple there are CHOICES, and I'm going to have to actually "shop" for a phone unless I want to talk to phone salespeople. Sigh. If I had just bought a WebOS phone last year, I would be pissed that the OS was being killed off but at least I would have had a good year or two knowing that I could trade in my phone for a new one next year. Two years with a dying OS? That's a different story. If I had been an early adopter, I think that I would have been happier being hosed.

Comment Re:Fire the board (Score 1) 239

The real HP was spun off by Carly into Agilent. As far as I know they are still doing just fine doing all those things that the original HP used to do.

No, they're not. Half its business has been sold or spun off since it was spun off in an IPO. It's not like a whole new management team showed up when HP spun it off.

Comment Re:Great... (Score 1) 481

Netflix is really just screwing over busy familes.

I can't even see this as sensible business plan. The world is moving to streaming, so Netflix is going to create a new company that ships old discs? Do they really expect this business will still be growing in 5 years?

People keep saying this and trying to get people to switch to streaming content. Well, that totally blows for two kinds of people. The poor and the technologically inept. Netflix would still have had a solid dvd business for the next 5-10 years. Now they won't have a solid business between the two.

It doesn't just blow for the technically adept, it blows for anyone who likes HD movies and wants them at a reasonable price. I have the streaming service and the DVD service which is upgraded to Blu-ray. For my $10/mo Blu-ray subscription, I get at least one HD movie each week. AppleTV charges $3.99 for HD movies. There is no price comparison.

I suppose I was one of the few people who didn't really care about the price increase as I had already done the math on how much it would cost to changes services (and that's not including changing equipment). Netflix has been a one-stop shop for my family, and that's who this is really screwing over. Families. The streaming service has been nice because there is a pretty decent catalog of educational and children's content WITHOUT COMMERCIALS!!! Seriously, no fruity pebbles. No beer ads. No smoking substitutes with people acting so satisfied as they exhale mist. Netflix streaming is a great way to control some of the popular (ie LCD) culture your children get exposed to. Does it suck that Netflix lost Starz? Sure, but I don't care. It's hard to find time to watch one movie a week, let alone something on streaming. What I don't understand is why it makes since for me to now have to look at two places for movies. Wasn't the whole point to make it all easier and more convenient? Maybe next they'll take a page from Microsoft and add a *&^%ing ribbon to the website, too.

Comment Re:No One (Score 1) 482

I wonder if anybody on Easter Island ever said, "Hey guys. Do you think we might be running out of trees?" But you know, after the fact I'm sure they were all like, "Oh man. Yeah, you were right. Now that we're all dead I can see that putting up idols for the gods was not as effective as managing our forests would have been."

A new book says that it was actually rats that caused the deforestation. A link to a book review is below.

WSJ.com

Comment Who cares about NFC on a MacBook Air? (Score 1) 250

How often am I going to swipe my MacBook at the grocery store? Who cares if a LAPTOP or DESKTOP computer doesn't have NFC built-in? I can see someone complaining about phones, but a computer? Seriously? Anyone see a lot of Macs in retail stores being used to process credit card payments? This is a non-story. The article speculates that it "could" mean Apple is giving up on NFC for the iPhone. Geez.

Comment Re:The Virtual Fence was always a dumb idea (Score 1) 437

One of the problems with the Mexican drug lords and gangs (they're not really cartels), is that they're heavily armed. Armed by US citizens who (legally) buy guns and (illegally) sell them to Mexicans for a profit....

As quite a few posters have pointed out, this is incorrect, but maybe, instead of focusing on where the guns in Mexico come from, people asked what Mexico would look like if law abiding Mexican citizens could more easily buy guns. Mexicans, for the most part, cannot defend themselves from an armed individual. Think about that from a public policy perspective. Mexican citizens are entirely dependent on a broken, incompetent, corrupt, and inept federal government to defend themselves from criminals armed by foreigners. What's happening in Mexico would NEVER happen in the U.S.A., and not because Mexico is a third world failed state. It would never happen because Americans SHOOT BACK.

Someone not interested in repressing the Mexican populace should run for office on a platform of arming the average Mexican. "A chicken in every pot, and a 12 gauge in every closet," as a campaign slogan, will get someone elected president of Mexico. Self help is a beautiful thing.

Comment Re:The Xbox is not a TV set box (Score 1) 182

Or if it is considered one, it's horrible. It plays a very limited amount of media.

Most of the set-top boxes play a very limited amount of media, but I don't think the big rush is for playing media but streaming content. The Xbox 360 already gets Netflix, and Microsoft penned a deal with ATT for the 360 to work as the cable box for the U-Verse service.

What I would be interested in seeing is whether they can make a set-top box that doesn't get blocked from the popular websites like GoogleTV, and how functional would be compared to the Windows alternatives you can buy now. You can already buy an eMachines Mini-e for around $300 or less with an HDMI output that can snap to the back of your HDTV's VESA mount. While a Mini-e runs Windows and not a simpler interface like GoogleTV or the Boxee Box, you (probably) don't have to worry about having it blocked by the major content websites.

Like many people, we pay for more cable TV content then we really need, and we'd love a solution that lets us pick and choose only what we want to watch. While it really is annoying to have to plug the laptop to the TV when we want to watch something off of the internet, I would be really P.O.'d to have bought a GoogleTV and then had content blocked. I want a simple, easy, NOT UGLY replacement for my cable TV subscription. If that means buying something from M$, I'll do it. I'll hate myself, but I'll do it. You never hear anyone on this site saying how much they love their cable TV and how that want less choice.

Comment Coyotes are dangerous (Score 2, Interesting) 222

“He’s not a threat. He’s not going to pick up your children,” Block said.

What an idiot. Coyotes kill pets, and evidence from the Carolinas indicates they are now affecting deer populations by decimating the survival rates of fawns. Coyotes are dangerous, and they attack humans. There were 142 attacks on humans between 1960 and 2006. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=coyotes-suburban-attacks

Coyotes have spread naturally to all lower 48 states because of declines in wolf populations. Another interesting tidbit is that the coyote is the only predator in North America whose recorded population has NEVER decreased, only increased. Why someone would give such an adaptable predator a leg up when it is doing fine is completely beyond me.

Slashdot Top Deals

Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.

Working...