Comment Re:Shipping Costs, Etc. (Score 1) 377
Yeah, it's just another way to cheat the government, and indirectly the people, out of taxes that we all have to pay...
Mod parent up! This is not trollish - it's true
Yeah, it's just another way to cheat the government, and indirectly the people, out of taxes that we all have to pay...
Mod parent up! This is not trollish - it's true
Only poor people pay taxes.
In contrast, the top 10% of taxpayers paid 55% of total federal taxes in 2007. The lower 90% of taxpayers paid the other 45%.
That sounds awful, but that is because the top 10% own all the money. Really, a proportional tax would have them pay even more of the tax burden because they control that much of all the money in the US. Let me introduce you to the L-curve: http://www.lcurve.org/
You can still allow the imports but tax them for the externalities they are excluding. We can still get stuff, albeit a little more expensive, but we encourage better standards. And in the short term we get a little extra cash instead of selling ourselves upstream.
If you want to make an impression on the server, leaving $0.00 is not a good method. Any number of reasons could why you left no tip, most likely is that you are cheap (in the server eyes).
You want to make a point? Leave a tip of $0.01. There's no misconstruing that message.
Wouldn't such a high tax rate be an incentive to hire more people vs. a disincentive? If you are going to lose the money anyways, you might as well get something more tangible for it.
but you can bet that after a short period of time that it's just there to shear the flock.
Most flocks exist to be fleeced
Frankly, many foreigners will not know where states are because - as you say - they "don't make the news a lot"
:) They aren't individually important in the world, unlike the US as a whole.
But in fairness, there's a number of Americans feel this same way about individual countries versus the EU as a whole. That position sounds reasonable given that is a bi-directional relationship of relative ignorance.
(Not saying one shouldn't have a better understanding of US or EU, but I can see the argument).
Again, right there on the page it says this that it shows how Apple's latest products support HTML 5. It doesn't say that apple.com supports the latest version of Firefox or IE.
I may be daft right now, but isn't the point of standards to avoid having pages determine what browsers they support? In fact, shouldn't it be the opposite - browsers identifying what's on the page and rendering what they understand? Apple.com doesn't have to support anything, but just stop blocking to be intellectually honest.
Overall, this isn't a big deal (Ad on a com site) but filtering on UA string and requesting a unique download for a standards demo is hamfisted. The download may as well be Flash at that point.
Bullshit. Anyone who would ever accept the name "liberal" in the U.S. is already buying into the idea that there is only one possible spectrum of ideas, which goes from "conservative" to "liberal."
Some of us just live in the real world and can indicate which is the closest approximation (YMMV) to their high level beliefs. If you don't feel they represent you, that is fine, but there is no reason to disparage people who feel like they can.
Ex: If someone is asked for their political ideology and they say they are a conservative, would you chastise them for not articulating each and every belief? Sounds like a lot of fun for everyone. (eye roll)
I agree that people should think more critically, but name calling isn't going to win over people who just don't care as much about politics.
FYI - if you don't think the links below are propaganda, then I question your ability to think openly.
http://www.politicalcompass.org/analysis2
http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz_result?e=30&i=70_30.gif&p=70 (A 'perfect score' = libertarian)
"Protozoa are small, and bacteria are small, but viruses are smaller than the both put together."