Comment Re:Cult of DevOps? (Score 2) 114
I'm guessing the main haters are sysadmins...
And that is exactly the chasm of the "us" and "them" attitude that the DevOps folks (IMHO) are trying to bridge. Thank you for your fine example, sir.
I'm guessing the main haters are sysadmins...
And that is exactly the chasm of the "us" and "them" attitude that the DevOps folks (IMHO) are trying to bridge. Thank you for your fine example, sir.
> Take your turf war elsewhere guys and let me have my integration.
You *are* the turf in their war, dude.
So you openly admit the machine IS NOT YOURS. You are essentially keeping them from their own machine, which I find unethical. I can't blame them for taking matters into their own hand and rebooting the system into single-user mode and locking you out until you play nice.
Stop being a jerk and cooperate with the owners of the machine you are renting or take your data elsewhere.
Simply because they own the property does not give them the right to invade your privacy. There is still the illusion of privacy here, right?
I was gonna say: "Why, oh dear Novel, why did you abandon iFolder?!", but it appears it has been granted a third life:
The guy who disliked me the most (actually accused me of sabotaging his win 95 box from the network, to our boss, just 18 months ago)
You were babysit^Wadministrating a Windows 95 machine in 2007?! Yikes!
I think that this is exactly what StackOverflow.com is intended to be.
A community driven wiki enabled forum catering a specific group of people (programmers, in this case).
Take a look at Joel's talk at Google on the subject:
BTW I still stand behind the principle that having IE with Windows is not anti-competative. If that were the case then Red Hat, Apple OS, and others would be anti-competative for having an browser pre-installed in their systems.
Repeat after me: Different Rules Apply To Monopolies.
Sheeesh... every damn time.
Last update to software in 2005 according to http://ruqueue.rutgers.edu/download/.
That would be a dealbreaker to me.
http://www.hdd-shredder.com/index_en.php
Not cheap. But neat!!!!
It amazes me that this has to be spelled out, but thank you for doing so.
If you're uncomfortable with images of mothers offering food to children, how about turning of the tele^W^W^W^W surfing to another website? You don't *have* to look, you know.
> So here's the question: Why should nursing mothers be accommodated
> by changes in Facebook policies, but exhibitionists / nudists not?
Because nursing a baby actually has a function. You know: feeding a helpless infant?
In my experience, your best bet in these cases is to walk the company's official path for software acquisition.
If no such path exists, your first step is to convince management to create it. Your common goal is to get the best sollutions for the problems at hand.
Here is a very usefull link of the dutch government on making FLOSS a viable option for software acquisition:
--> http://www.ososs.nl/files/acquisition_of_open-source_software_-_text.pdf
What is research but a blind date with knowledge? -- Will Harvey