Then you're not fit to sit on a jury. Nullification is the entire reason we have juries. It's the last defense against a government run amok.
-jcr
bullshit. Jury nullification is a breach of your responsibility as a juror and a complete cop out. A jury is there to render a non biased verdict as to whether someone broke the law they were charged with, nullification is dangerous (though sometimes I agree with it too, but should be a very very rare occurance). A Jury is often working on incomplete information, this is done to attempt to keep bias out. As an example I was a juror on a murder trial, we had one member of the Jury that even though she thought the woman was obviously guilty she had believed the sob story told and wanted to basically give a not guilty verdict as she thought the punishment was too harsh. We spent more time in the Jury room than in the court room as we were excluded from a lot of evidence and discussion. It wasn't until after the trial we found out what a scumbag the woman on trial really was, but that would have potentially biased our verdict to assume she was guilty (e.g. wasn't till afterwards we found it was the 3rd person she had stabbed, or that she was a druggie with a long history of violent attacks).