I've still got my Firefox "Take Back The Web" t-shirt.

.
Maybe there should be a "Take Back Firefox" t-shirt....

It's Mozilla's problems, not Firefox's.

.
Mozilla has become so full of itself, it's lost in a cul-de-sac of self-importance.

Mozilla needs to grow past the "we know better" phase and start listening to its users again.

Unless and until Mozilla does that, Firefox will continue losing market share to Chrome.

Maybe Mozilla should "get over it", bring Firefox back to its roots, and stop making Firefox more and more bloated with superficial features whilst significant architectural issues remain unresolved.

When I tried Chrome, I noticed that it changes the system http proxy settings, instead of just changing the browser's proxy settings. In other words, when I set Chrome to use my privoxy proxy, Chrome then changes the global http proxy for Windows, so that everything else on the PC uses privoxy (which I do not want to happen). Does Chrome still have this behavior?

Or is it still the same you will do it the Mozilla way Australis [sp?] mess?

Is certifying an engine that will carry humans to be safe for carrying humans a "waste"?

.

In a general sense, correct.

.
However, when I said "cloud-based storage" I meant the cloud service was a storage service, not a social media service. If I had meant facebook, I would have said cloud-based social media service.

More than a few of my [real world] friends use facebook as their archive for photos, eschewing local or cloud-based storage for their historical family photos. They would be unhappy if facebook were to randomly start deleting photos just because they've been on facebook for a period of time.

.
Of course, I've told those friends that facebook may not have the same photo-preservation goals as they do, but they seem to be unconcerned.

Thanks, that is what I meant to imply.

So then, aren't size comparisons between OpenSSL and s2n at best useless, and at worst intentionally misleading?

Someone posts an opinion in a blog, and it becomes a /. article.

.
I post an opinion here and it is mod'd as flamebait. Must be some Apple fanboys around..... :)

I've always thought of Safari as more of an "also ran" than anything resembling a leader in the browser market.

The problems are well known yet development of the jet continues.

A self-appointed spokesperson for "most people"?

Once the RFC "passes", they are out of standard.

.
I had to replace my 11-year-old wireless access point because it did only SSL3 and my browsers refused to connect to it in their default configuration. Even though the firmware in the access point is upgradeable, Netgear stopped supporting that unit long ago.

So what about all the devices that are not upgradeable? Well, the first thing is not to expose them to insecure networks....