Comment Let me fix that for you... (Score 1) 618
Display ads are still an important bread-and-butter income stream.
Display ads are still an important malware distribution mechanism..
Display ads are still an important bread-and-butter income stream.
Display ads are still an important malware distribution mechanism..
.
The Start menu takes up nearly half the screen with large icons, yet truncates the text for those large icons because the text has not been allocated enough room. Really, really poor UI design.
I lost control of the Windows Update process, there were no options for me to select besides, ~allow Microsoft to brick my computer at any time~.
My versions of Windows 7 are supported with security updates until 2020.
So tell me again, why do I want to dump Windows 7 and move to Windows 10? To please Microsoft is not a valid answer.
.
(and, no, my email address is not @aol.com, and never has been)
The Atlantic has an article asking whether autonomous cars need windows....
There are windows on space capsules.
There are windows on railroad passenger cars.
There are windows in houses.
.
My guess is that people, in general, like to look outside.
...It's all well and good for Microsoft to say "nailed it". That doesn't make it true....
Bingo!
.
And that's why I provided substantiation to show that Microsoft is often over-confident when it comes to such pronouncements.
So you reference an article that's ten years old?...
Yes. The article's true. An oldie but a goodie.
.
Given all the recent problems with Windows Update, and that Microsoft wants to use home users as beta test sites for future Windows Updates, I would think the 10 year old article is pretty close to reality nowadays.
.
Remember when Microsoft declared the buffer overflow bugs were eliminated from Windows XP?
...very sensible man should consider this a wild speculation at the moment
Let me fix that for you: "anyone who disagrees with me is not sensible."
.
There, much better.
...It's a well-kept secret, but 95 per cent of the climate models
Yes, most, if not all, of the climate are in error. They do not forecast the global climate with 100% accuracy.
.
They never will forecast the global climate with 100% accuracy. So they will always be in error.
However, they currently are accurate enough to forecast a future climate that has problems, and time is running out to prevent those problems from growing so large that they are all but irreversible.
The question is, do we start to address global warming now? Or do we wait until the models have 100% accuracy, at which time it will be too late to do anything about the problem.
Why is this story here?...
Page hits.
To the systems programmer, users and applications serve only to provide a test load.
