If Lilyhammer has taught me anything, it's that the russians have no problem 'importing' alcohol into Scandinavia.

Well, for the purposes of this study, how about in the category of people who actually still pay federal income tax once all their refunds come back.

Were the metaphors in question, not enough(read none) multi-megaton nuclear weapons were not emplaced to target the eldritch horrors as a last ditch defense in case the entire elaborate system of sacrifices came crashing down? Cause that was all I really got from the ending.

Not really, they tried to get that fanfare. Since it's much easier with that amount of money to merely CNC a score of 1911s out of solid steel and have much better guns, they were ignored.

The stupid is strong in this one. The last 10 years with continuously dropping murder rates and the massive gun boom in the US created by Obama shows that you don't know jack shit about the topic at hand. Not to mention that the accidental death rates from guns in the US is the lowest it's been at since they pretty much started keeping remotely accurate statistics.

If by add a good chunk of the cost you mean from several hundred to several thousand percent depending on the device, you are correct.

Unless a Reston style variant decides to transfer to humans. Then we're pretty fucked.

As the etymology of the word bad most probably derives from the old english word baeddel meaning hermaphrodite/effeminate man, I seriously doubt that gay being used as a euphemism for stupid/crappy will stop anytime soon.

The AC above me was implying that the 2nd only applied to the militia. Clearly he never learned the terms prefatory or justification clause in his Grammar courses.

When you cannot get the result you want, you present the data in such a way that the results are inconclusive. Govt grant research procurement 101.

If they won't properly choose their researchers and always use biased morons who can't even massage the data out of a wet paper bag, why the fuck should someone keep giving them money so they can keep fucking that particular chicken?

Ah, libtard idiocy. The rulings said that being composed of people, they had some of the same rights. For that matter, I don't think I've heard of any laws limiting corporation security forces to weapons any crappier than most civilians. In fact, in most jurisdictions, especially bastions of libtard idiocy, they have more rights to weapons than the average civilian.

The third study that comes up on google scholar is one by Kellerman. KELLERMAN. The man should have been hounded out of the field years ago.

Well, no, it's because the only studies done by the CDC were shoddier than a shed built by a cross-eyed one-armed carpenter without measuring tools. The reason for this is because the CDC has a prior anti-gun bias and so kept hiring that dickcheese Kellerman to perform the studies. Kellerman sucks at even performing studies that at least have the surface appearance of being unbiased and is always immediately ripped apart as soon as his methodology becomes known.

It seems to you, thus proving that you need to retake that 5th grade math class.