There's nothing in my comments that indicates I was referring to the "iron curtain" speech, why do you say that?

You did notice the he said it to Truman correct? It was not stated as part of his speech even though the dates match.

Since it is a quote between 2 people you can't prove it didn't happen, and I can't prove it did.

So you went and dug up his Fulton speech but you didn't even notice it was between Truman and Winston.
Or did you?

In addition, I believe I stated it may be propaganda.

Turns out, unless you have video of them saying it, quotes are difficult to prove either way.
With video only slightly less difficult.

There's nothing funny about it, all humans lie and obfuscate, take a look at the Palestinian conflict...

The guy that runs that site has a Jewish name as well...

Maybe it was removed, maybe it's propaganda.

The majority of the World was involved in WW2, everyone learned of it, and *ALMOST* no one walking around today was involved...

The truth is one gets discussed and "used" far more than any others.

If a planet has liquid water on it it's just a matter of when life exist not if.

Personally I think a lot of cellular level life is out there blowing around like dandelions, they drop in and adapt.

HFT is physical of course, hardware, network, etc, but it resides in a digital domain while Uber is out and about in the physical World.
Yes they use their systems to manipulate pricing, location, etc to their advantage.

But the results occurs in the physical.
Nothing "physical" about stocks... unless you want to argue minutiae.

Good riddance.

I agree, if you need evidence of this claim look to Hardline.

Won't buy it then.

The HFT of the physical World.

Pikers... LOL.

You know when I consider the psychology of the average human beings I have come into contact with, the reason for all this grief for Jews could be as simple as their being successful.

I read example after example where Jews show up in a new land with nothing, and become successful.

Nothing generates as much hate as success, in those that do not have it.
In addition, nothing shows you where you stand, or what you are, as well as another persons success in an area you have none.

If a person works their whole life in a town, and one day a man shows up with nothing, then 10 years later owns a profitable business, and a home, and the life long townie still has nothing...
Imagine what a weak person might conjure in their minds to absolve themselves of their failure and explain the others success.

We even have a contemporary saying for this: "haters gunna hate".

That's interesting thank you.

The problem with this thinking is that we take a percentage of a group, we find their behaviour repugnant, but then rather than address the individuals involved, people take the path of blaming the entire group.

This was one of the reasons Spinoza (a personal hero of mine) was kicked out of his Jewish community in Amsterdam.
The Jews there were trying to escape the "purges" of the times, they knew anyone causing trouble in their community may wind up getting them all blamed.

And they were correct in this thinking, history shows this.
It didn't help he wanted to learn Latin either, or could not simply "accept" church dogma.

Very well written, I have read this before as well and yet I still have trouble people could allow it.
It doesn't speak well of humans.

I would ask one thing, do you think this was the main reason, the driving force that allowed them to do what they did.

Which is why I believe Hillary Clinton is targeting young people and women in her campaign.
Easy to ply NaÃveté in the youth vote, and empathy votes form the less politically aware females.

In our case, do we have anything but "these politicians" to vote for?
Always seems to be 2 sides of the same coin.