Comment Re:Looks an awful lot like the iPad mini (Score 1) 60
I never have replaced a tablet, so I don't know
I never have replaced a tablet, so I don't know
No my example is not false.
As it is exactly how it works in west europe.
That it is different in your country makes my statement not false.
The only way a bakery can change prices here over the course of the day is to give a discount (in the evening e.g) to sell stuff that is otherwise thrown away.
O only supported the OPs point that shooting a modern olympic bow has nothing to do with archery.
You try to make a mess out of that.
I stand to my standpoint that archery should cover basic skills in using a 'primitive' bow.
If you disagree, that is up to you.
Making an argument about it, trying to get a non native english speaker into a dispute with a native one over spelling mistakes or true scotsmen
Have a nice day.
Of course Emacs is an operting system! However it lacks a decent editor!
That is why I use vi/vim as well!
which is why he is investing on a technology that is going to displace oil and outright kill renewables.
Why should any power source build on LENR kill renewables?
First you need plants, takes decades to build a big plant.
Then they need to be _cheaper_ than the renewables.
And the main problem: do LENR plants even produce enough heat to be feasable as electric power plant?
Perhaps a 'table top' fusion/LENR plant is usefull to heat a room, or even a house or for cooking, but making it usefull for an electric plant is a long way to go.
Actually you can use Emacs now indeed, with current memory sizes 'eight megs and continiously swapping' won't happen anymore
And I don't like people who do not grasp the difference between a framework and a library.
Hint: JQuery is not a framework.
Many LENR reactions (if not all) are fusion reactions.
Or how do you call it if a H atom "combines" with another one?
Low energy fusion in vacuum are researched since the 1890s (yes, eight teen not nine teen), especially japanese, italian and german researchers did stuff like this over 100 years ago. Easy to google btw.
The majority of archers shoot bows like:
Yumi
Long bow, british
Recurve hunting bows
Skyth bows
Hungarian bows
Korean bows
and plenty of others
Only retards shoot an olympic bow. Regarding your 'butthurt' I only supported the minimal sense, my parent's post made.
Regarding your [what]
If you want to defend that toy bows are the right thing for the Olympics, don't talk to me
Regarding to shooting an Olympic bow, that kind of archery is no challange in respect to true archery. In regards to that I'm on par with our retarded GP.
Bottom line: I don't get about what you are arguing
Winning the Olympics means you shoot better than the other competitors
Runnig fast in the Olympics means there are less than 100 people on the planet and in future likely less than 1000 (or lets make it 10000) people who EVER will be faster than you.
In which regard, Limpy?
The Nokia has an aluminium body, the nexus is plastics with a small frame of aluminium at the edge.
So in my eye the Nokia is far superior, what are your thoughts?
The 'fuck' I talk about is the 'fakt' that you don't know the simplest thing about any constitution.
That does not give the dollar a power, it is your contract that forces you to pay in dollar.
If you had a contract with me you would pay in euroes, which would not give the euro any more power.
No idea where your wiered ideas come from.
When I program on a unix system I use Java
It is simply not incorrect.
But arguing with you makes no sense
Of course it is subjective.
However if you don't grasp the difference between better shoes and a bow that is not a bow then you don't qualify for the discussion.
You could as well say a remote controlled ball, for soccer, golf or tennis is fine
Sorry, but a bow with stabelizers and aiming assists has nothing to do with archery
Shoot a now and get a clue instead of nitpicking about words.
Tool A in competition X
Tool B in competition Y
Actually, no Europe is not. They are exporting their Co2 production to China and India where imports from them have increased over 10 fold and Europe is facing de-industrialization issues not only with those two countries but with former soviet countries who have no restrictions. The only thing Europe is showcasing is how to export Co2 production and tank their economies.
Well, the rest of your post is already nonsense. But this tops it.
Why don't you simply check how much Europe is importing from China?!
You could even compare that with the CO2 reduction done in Europe the last 20 years and the increase of CO2 production in China over the last 20 years. Hint: regardless of your idiotic (false!) claims the reduction in CO2 production in Europe is still more than the increase in China.
Perhaps you like to talk about the USA? But I really doubt that the US shifted much of their CO2 production to China and import that many goods now.
This is simpy a US strawman argument.
The rest of your post(s) clearly shows you how sciense and research works
How exactly should a government do its own research? Paying funds to a private company? Or having its own research institutions competing with private companies?
Taxing what you don't want, like pollution, and leaving the rest to 'the market' workes quite fine if you leave the market otherwise alone.
Where there's a will, there's a relative.