Comment Re:Copyright? (Score 1) 194
Of course derived works infringe copyright. Why don't you simply read the aprobriated law?
How ever in thise case we don't have derived work
Of course derived works infringe copyright. Why don't you simply read the aprobriated law?
How ever in thise case we don't have derived work
No, you can not reduce 'the grid' storage etc. does not help you in any way having the necessary capacity to transport the amount of energy that is needed at a certain time.
It only helps you to store surplus and leaves you the option not to power up plants but use the previously stored surplus.
Bottom lime for a random factory close to you, the grid changes not at all.
Hint: if your town needs 2GW power around noon, the grid has to handle 2GW, it does not care if the power comes from a plant or a battery close to you. The total energy is the same.
Why don't youndo the math then?
Energy is m * v ^ 2.
Obviously doubeling the v goes to the square for total energy, while doubeling the mass only doubles the energy.
Wind energy increases in a turbine with the speed by the cube because first of all the air follows the same e = m * v ^ 2
Ona grand scale wind and solar are reliable.
They are just not dispatchable.
A huge difference!
You do know that Scottland and also other european countries have test installations in sea water since over 20 years?
Ah, you don't
ocean swells which could've provided energy to propel ships.
Energy yes.
but you are aware that wind and sails are a very simple means to propell a ship without any need to store/convert energy and then use it in a special device likema propeller?
It's because average wind energy is denser than the fraction of wave energy you can extract from something bobbing on the surface.
That is nonsense.
The rest of your post makes not much sense either. Who cares about efficiency? The only things that are relevant are: cost, space, amount of energy/power produced. Who cares if the wave only gives away 10% of their total energy due to that? What has that to do with any rational meams of the term 'efficiency'?
Wrong on all accounts.
Neither is the energy of waves to low nor do they rip anything apart. And yes, around coasts waves are very common
We are talking here about off shore waves, not breakers that ram into a steep coast.
Wave energy systems we have since decades. But so far they where not economic (durability, maintenance etc. ) feasable.
Especially for side to side movements.
Ofc smart grids help.
Especially if they have access to grid wide 'storage'
Nevertheless
SmartGrids like I believe you mean them, are usefull to prevent wasting the peak solar energy around day time
So your comment smells of trolling with no real insight in the field.
Two mistakes in one sentence, hohohoho. Go figure
Yeah yeah
For starters: "peak demand" is not at the morning when everyone stays up, but it starts around 10:00/11:00 and lasts till 15:00/16:00.
Of course power grids need to be build for the peak and not for the average
No idea about your project, sounds like a household project to me
Cankes don't rip because of wind
Unfortunately the resonance frequency of buildings is not affected by hight but by the length and the width of the building.
If there is dead squirrel in a transformator, it certainly died not on shortening some power
Must be very difficult anyhow to make transformators sqirrel proof.
Who showed them how to get inside? What tools do they use?
Or are they simply smarter than the european ones?
EMPs can only be caused by nuke explosions in very high altitudes.
So, whom do you fear who has such a capability?
A facist is not a good man. (Oh, ent to type racist, but facist is just as good)
Actually, I'm free of sins, no idea anout you, though.
But good luck with your life if you 'believe' 1500 year old 'wrong' christian 'stereotypes' make any sense
A list is only as strong as its weakest link. -- Don Knuth