Comment Re:This isn't scaremongering. (Score 1) 494
Google isn't helpful with this one, you have to ask someone lol
You're hoping for some future technology to save us all--a deus ex machina.
Is it incorrect to have hope for the future when it comes to technology? If you told someone from 1959 that in 10 years we would have our human deus ex machina moment all the way to the moon, and then go walk around on it...the response would probably be incredulous. But after so much win happening all around us every day, isn't a bit premature to suggest that we can't collectively come up with a solution by simply giving the science or the market time to cook up something more effective than an edict from above could provide?
"Big Oil" works out pretty well for everyone right now. Eventually we'll be complaining about "Big Algae", I'm certain.
Predicting the weather and predicting the climate are too very different things.
Whoosh. I know you're educated about that specific point, but my point with my flawed comparison is that half-baked logically-flawed ideas will become serious obstacles when you present an idea that suggests you might have to do anything resembling austerity. Like cutting meat out of your diet, for example, which if you suggest it most people will give you a pretty forceful and vehement rejection outright. Facts are out of scope at that point.
You're certainly entitled to your point of view, but don't try to tell me what I believe.
I think of the feminist concept as just a tool, in the toolbox of the modern miserable, sex-obsessed, bossy, and manipulative woman. The people who use that tool come off as power hungry and getting off on control. You could call that viewpoint insecure, or you could call it being annoyed by people who look at life through terms of how much power they have and what is holding them back from getting more, and don't have much else to talk about. To each their own.
hold down these three buttons and cycle power
Those kind of features are normally customer request, unfortunately. Nothing can be done.
the terribly bad design we typically see in embedded
Most people just don't have the raw mental horsepower to write low-level or OS-level code and have it work GOOD.
It takes god-like powers, a will of steel, a precient intuition, a mind like a steel trap for details, a dashing appearance, the ability to leap over tall buildings in a single bound, and be very well endowed to be able to pull it off. It isn't something you can throw at a kid fresh out of college and zero experience for cheap without running into problems because it takes a few years of practice to evolve into a diety with phenominal cosmic powers.
You realise that the ancient Greeks knew the Earth is round, right?
Aww, he's trying to argue. Look at him use his words! Such a good boy.
I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.