Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Cue the bitching (Score 3, Insightful) 182

WRONG. Punishing early adopters would be if Apple started adding these apps to NEW Touches, and NOT offering an upgrade to existing Touch owners at all.

What happens when you buy a computer with Windows XP and then Vista comes out and you want the computer to have that instead? You have to pay to upgrade it, that's what. Even if its the same hardware... costing the SAME price (or less).

Yes, it'd be very cool if manufacturers just doled out free software/feature updates for everyone in perpetuity... but that's not realistic. Apple simply doesn't treat the Touch as a product that gets free feature upgrades. You can get the latest firmware, you just won't get the new APPS. Pay close attention to how this works. In about one month, or so... you'll look at 5 high-calibre apps for $20 as a nice deal. Apple DOES treat the iPhone and Apple TV as products that will receive free updates and features. WHY? Because they structured their accounting that way, and specifically because they represent two NEW fields for Apple (cellphone/video) that Apple wants to remain competitive in. Those 5 apps have NOTHING to do with being competitive in the PMP/Mp3 market. They're already KING BANANA their, and NO ONE else offers features that these 5 apps do on your mp3 player. NO ONE. --So, $20. Big whoop. Does it make iPod Touch a PDA now? Yes, basically. They've now changed the product from an PMP to a PDA... and you get to stay current by paying $20. If only all manufacturer upgrades were that easy to jump on-board with.
Editorial

Submission + - Apple Class Action story (slashdot.org)

CleverBoy writes: Could someone correct this? It looks bad. At the end of the story, it says that Apple removed the original post. If you actually look at the article, and view the screenshot, its very clear that the messageboard is MacRumors... NOT the official Apple support messageboard (which has had its share of removed posts). Apple did NOT remove this. If anything, MacRumors, or "the forum" removed the original post. My impression is that calling for a class action is against the forum rules. Saying Apple removed the story just sounds like an attempt to make Apple seem more draconian. Also... guys... submitting a correction to a story is really bad here. It took me forever looking for a simple button, and then after clicking through to the FAQ and trying to submit this as a story, your website was having connection issues. There should be an easier way. I wanted to just give up.
It's funny.  Laugh.

Submission + - Busted. iPhone.com now owned by Apple, Inc. (myphonewar.com)

CleverBoy writes: "There was a point recently, where the ads appearing on iPhone.com, began to cross the line of someone simply looking to run a business, and someone who was clearly deriving profit from Apple, Inc's joint trademark with Cisco. Apparently, Apple has finally caught up with them, and however it has worked out, the domain name now uses Apple's nameservers, and redirects to Apple's iPhone website, joining iPhone.org in Apple's iPhone domain portfolio. Clearly, advertising competitive products under a trademarked domain name (ie. music playing phones), is NOT the way to go if you wish to keep your domain name. Odds are however, the previous owner has agreed not to discuss the settlement (or near-miss legal action)."
The Internet

Submission + - Destination iPhone.com - Casualty of War (myphonewar.com)

CleverBoy writes: "It appears the destination of iPhone.com has become a recent casualty of war. In the last week, the registrant of the domain name has decided to pack it in as a direct destination for the company that owns it, a business that has nothing to do with the Cupertino crusader. Indeed, what would YOU do, if the domain name for your company began receiving an exhorbitant amount of non-converting visitors, only interested in someone else's product?"

Slashdot Top Deals

An authority is a person who can tell you more about something than you really care to know.

Working...