Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Personally... (Score 2) 558

You would think so. Each side (prosecution and defense) get to dismiss jurors. Generally, the lawyers like to have complete control of everything in the case - they want to define what (for example) 'rape trauma syndrome' means according to their expert witness so that it better fits their case.

Having a juror with prior knowledge of a relevant subject will probably be to the detriment of at least one side of the case, so those types of people are regularly dismissed.

Comment Re:Essential (Score 1) 715

I understand that Credit Cards can be nice. Nice to make large purchases now. Nice to cover the gap until payday when your bank account is empty. Nice for a lot of things. But people will be fine if their CC doesn't work for a day or two. There are other resources available to put food on the table, etc.

I think my original point still stands though. If your credit card not working for a couple days has a significant affect on your life (i.e. your ability to provide for your family), then YES you are too dependent on credit cards. If you NEED a credit card to put food on the table, you're already in the red - using a credit card will just put you further into the red. Credit card companies surely deserve some, but not 100% of the blame for that situation.

Comment Re:Idiots! (Score 2, Insightful) 715

It would do a lot of people well to not have such a close dependence on credit cards. And for that, they are not innocent. We're all guilty for empowering these organizations so much and allowing them to become so essential to our lives that we can't do without them. Sounds like an addiction to me if your life can't "run smoothly" without them for a day or two.

Slashdot Top Deals

If all else fails, lower your standards.

Working...