About $10 on a $2000- $5000 machine.

What are you talking about? The fan is on the inside of the building that the ATM is mounted on.
That way the fan actually improves the flow of cooled air into the machine.

And how are they going to block the holes in the back?

You need LastPass or KeepPass. Completely eliminates that problem.

This is in China.
The same thing would probably cost $48,000 in the U.S.

So, undaunted, they built it again.
And it sank into the swamp...

That's because it would be too cruel to leave the citizens of backwards states,
in other words red states, to the mercy of their ignoramus leaders.

What the fuck are you talking about?
You made a point about the Kock brothers, jbengt showed that you are full of shit (as have hundreds of others) and
you reply "Yes, I'm sure no other billionaires would think to do that"

WTF is that supposed to mean?

"Scientific studies" and "Business school professors" have nothing to do with each other.

That's why, when I last bought glasses, I bought two pairs: progressives for day-to-day use and single-focus pair for computer use.
Tell your opto that you plan to do this, and he/she will write you two prescriptions, one for each.

And by the way, Zenni in the U.S., and ClearlyContacts in Canada both provide excellent value.

Yeah, like that's the whole fucking point.
The only way a machine can identify idiots is by their excessive speed.

Citation or bullshit.
Even if the average driver goes at a reasonable speed without speed limits, there will always be asshats who drive at unsafe speeds because they think they are F1 drivers when in fact they suck.

Once again, Dawkins demonstrates that he knows nothing about probability.
His intuitions about what is likely or unlikely are based on nothing but his feelings, and that is not science.

Absent the belief in God, your scriptures become nothing but a pile of mutually contradicting fairy tales.
Therefore, using scriptures to prove the existence of God is inherently foolish.
Trying to prove the non-existence of God is equally foolish.

Wrong.
Whether God exists or not has nothing to do with what you can or cannot explain.
Maybe the reason you can't explain it is because it doesn't exist. Or maybe it's because you haven't collected enough evidence.
Or maybe you just haven't figured it out yet. None of those explanations is any more "probable" than any other.

If you can show that some event occurs more often than chance would predict, then we can say that event is relatively probable.
It has nothing to do with your intuitions about what seems likely or unlikely.