we'd need a massive conspiracy of megalomaniac genius experts in artifcial intelligence who intentionally develop malware to infect military robots that go around shooting people

That's right.
And that mysterious organization would have a James Bond-like name, say "Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency".

Exactly.
We will have killer robots because most robot research is funded by the military: hence the "D" of DARPA.
A bunch of killer robots is exactly what they want.

Of course, after they kill all the enemies, they will just lay down their arms and serve us. Wouldn't they?

I shall run screaming from the oncoming robot overlord killing machines! Ahhhh! Ahhhhh! - Gahhk!

Well then, you clearly need Old Glory Insurance.

There was an article here recently suggesting that consciousness is non-computable.

Only if you start out by defining it as non-computable.

Moore's Law and similar technologies (massively parallel computing etc) will result in systems exponentially more powerful than IBM's Watson. At some point a future Watson or Google AI system will make "decisions" indistinguishable from a human's.

If you want to fantasize like that, nobody is going to stop you. But your reasoning is nonsense.

You could increase the speed of the Watson hardware a hundred times, and do you know what difference it would make?
Other than answering a bit faster, absolutely none.

It's software that limits an AI program's capabilities, not hardware.
And we currently have no idea how to create intelligent software.

A "new intelligent species" would need to do a lot more than analyze insurance policies. That's just an application.
Watson, on the other hand, comes remarkably close.

So, have you ever asked yourself "What or who am I?"?

Did you say "yes"? Interesting, because that is exactly how a chatbot would reply to the same question.

It is completely impossible to say whether any entity, living or not, possesses that kind of introspective intelligence.
Thus, your test is non-falsifiable, or in other words, just a lot of philosophical horseshit.

Don't forget cupholders!

Where range anxiety is a rather smaller issue.

So half of your points have to be labelled "2." and half have to be labelled "3."?
That sucks!

I think about half the idiots posting crap about them are liberals trying to make conservatives look like idiots.

No need, they will do it themselves.
But this crap doesn't come from "conservatives" in the Eisenhower/McCain sense, but from loony-right TeaBaggers like Ted Cruz.

find out that Jane is actually a man posing as a woman

Does that mean he/she wins the Imitiation Game ?

I mean, I've found out that you have been writing about me and my Slashdot comments FOR YEARS

That's probably because you have been submitting some of the most consistently stupid reasoning on /. FOR YEARS.

Not since 1983, when it was redefined in terms of the speed of light.

By then, there won't be time for any critical analysis leading to rejection of the agreement.