Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:China has an internet? (Score 4, Interesting) 58

for normal people? 2003 or so.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

But it's crony captalisim at it's best. First they allow access to a western site to get the feel of it, then they have uncle at the military have the site blocked. Then Jr creates a clone version of that site. The pirate site then gets popular since you can't access the real site, and well billion + people means millions of users which means nice watch, a couple of apartments and shark fin soup for uncle.

It's a joke.

Comment Re:It's all about the input (Score 1) 58

Japanese has it's two alphabets + some chinese lettering, but Chinese.. is well.. Chinese. And there are different input methods that some people like best. And a bunch of people just steer clear because it's not intuitive.

The hard part is if you don't remember how something's written you have to fall back to speech to text, or dial a friend.

Comment Re:Propaganda for Chinese cell manufacturers? (Score 1) 58

connivence and portability too.

Mobile networks are much more faster than the states, which leads itself to being more mobile friendly.

Everywhere you go there are tonnes of phone vendors, and very few PC vendors, I think the input and language barriers behind a PC are just too high for most people to deal with.

Comment Amiga 2000's are plagued with battery leakage (Score 4, Informative) 192

which is the primary reason why not to buy one. The zoro cards, especially ethernet can be hard to come by, so unless you get a loaded one... well it's pointless.

I've also had issues with bus noise by maxing out a 2000 with a bridge board, 2065, 68038 upgrade, and ram card. It really was incredibly unstable.

The 2000 has the same CPU as the 500, and 1000. It really was a pointless model. The 3000 and 3000T's are much nicer. And I should add the even a bare 3000 is far more stabler than a loaded 2000.

The other issue now is WinUAE is so good, it can run BSD, AMIX, along with all the software from the Amiga heyday. Considering how funky old machines can be, why even bother?

Comment Re:Stupid Article (Score 1) 236

^^THIS. NeXTSTEP was portable at this point anyways, and the Intel port at this juncture was the most stable. Porting it to the PowerPC in hindsight was a complete waste of time.

Also it was IBM that screwed up 2Ghz G5's and couldn't (and wouldn't) deliver a G5 suitable for a laptop. Certainly nothing like a MacBook Air.

Even the PS4 and XBone use AMD x64's.

PowerPC is cooked.

Comment Ha! (Score 1) 236

Is apple using PowerPC chips today? no.

All IBM did was derail the Motorola 88000 chip which was an evolutionary dead end anyways, but what it really did was kill the 68080 and beyond. The 68060 was more akin to the Pentium in design as the 68040 was to the Intel 80486. IBM stepped in and killed off Motorola chip fabrication, killing a bunch of 68000 based vendors including Commodore, Atari, NeXT and so on.

The fact that ARM has killed PowerPC in embedded space just speaks volumes to what a malaligned bone headed deal this was.

All IBM did was get other parties to help with fabbing newer POWER processors for the RS/6000 and to embed in new mainframes.

Apple uses Intel and ARM processors.

Comment Ever since the industry went to PCI (Score 1) 502

Which meant that without some hackery ISA DMA channels are unavailable breaking all the existing sound blaster games in MS-DOS I haven't cared. Sure for a while there was some interesting TSR's that'd hook with emm386 to simulate the ISA DMA to a PCI sound card, but now that we live in the future, I can use something like PCem, and just emulate the entire PC.

Also, since that horrible time, even the cheapest Pentium II board had built in AC97 sound support. But I see that Creative Labs is trying to keep the Sound Blaster name relevant these days, and even partners with motherboard OEM's to embed the SB stuff onto boards. Even my MSI z87 has a SoundBlaster built in. Although it doesn't matter, I run it through an amp I found on the street, through some speakers I bought for $50 Hong Kong. It sounds 'good enough ' to me.

Unless it's 220, 5, 1 I really don't care.

Comment I'm always amazed MS blew the mapping race (Score 5, Interesting) 174

when they had Microsoft TerraServer running on those sweet DEC Alpha's back in 1998. Instead of launching a new and exciting mapping service, they just settled for a minor showcase for SQL Server 7 with a database greater than 1TB.

Talk about a company with zero vision.

Comment Re:Can I play Descent on it? (Score 1) 133

Well... it installs, it's DOS4G/W (I'd forgotten!) and it'll run with all drivers disabled (I didn't test otherwise) ... Setup the sound card as a sound blaster

  Complete the Sound Blaster 16 Configuration.
  IRQ 5
  8-bit DMA 1
  16-bit DMA 7
  MPU-401 I/O address
  Disable (MPU-401 MIDI device is not supported)

Once the game loads up the ship bounces around like crazy, and you get destroyed within seconds.. So, I'm guessing Descent doesn't handle fast machines, so while it 'works' it's not proper.. It'd probably better off in something like PCem, or just old fashioned DOSBox...

Comment Re:Can I play Descent on it? (Score 2) 133

I'm installing it right now... I chose the "Microsoft Windows" profile, and selected "Windows 3.1"... You need to make sure that the CD-ROM has the highest boot priority in the BIOS... (hammer F2 on reboots), eventually you'll catch it...

the install is SLOW... no doubt about it.

I also installed it on QEMU, and yeah terribly slow.

With QEMU thought, I did get DOOM v1.1 with sound working, so that is nice!

Slashdot Top Deals

I tell them to turn to the study of mathematics, for it is only there that they might escape the lusts of the flesh. -- Thomas Mann, "The Magic Mountain"

Working...