Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
User Journal

Journal Journal: Looking to set things up

What I have:
Computers:
1 modern x86 machine (Semperon 2600+). PCI only, and sound is so modern it has no DOS support. Onboard sound, also a PCI sound card (both no DOS support), and 10/100 (possibly gigabit) ethernet. Standard parallel and 9-pin serial ports.
1 pentium 1. PCI and ISA, onboard sound which presumably works with DOS, IIRC onboard ethernet (haven't tested the speed). Standard parallel and 9-pin serial ports.
1 486. ISA only. No sound. Standard parallel and 9-pin serial ports.
1 Sparcstation 10. SBUS only. Sound, onboard 10baseT/AUI ethernet. 25-pin serial port and sun parallel port.
Networking equipment:
2 PCI 10/100 ethernet cards.
1 ISA 10baseT/thinnet/AUI ethernet card
4 cat5[e] cables
2 24-port 10/100 hubs, rear stacking connectors, AUI, one with fiber.
1 8-port 100baseT switch.
1 plip cable
1 25-pin slip cable
1 25-9 pin serial adapter
What I can probably accquire:
1 ISA 10/100 ethernet card
1 cat5[e] cable
What I can connect to:
LAN. 1 ethernet jack. Must have a single MAC address on the end of it.
What I want:
Play modern windows games over the LAN with IPX
Play dos games with sound
Permanently accessible webserver running
All computers able to access the lan, at least with TCP/IP
Anyone figure out a way to get this all working?
TIA for any advice

User Journal

Journal Journal: The book meme thing

1. Grab the nearest book.
2. Turn to page 23.
3. Find the fifth sentence.
4. Post the text of the sentence in your journal along with these instructions.

---

Nearest Book: "Market Forces" by Richard Morgan
ISBN: 0-575-07584-8

Fifth sentence on page 23: "'The hospital?' Hamilton's voice was politely disbelieving."

Movies

Journal Journal: A good film

Night Watch (no relation to the Terry Pratchett book of the same name), though not as good as the last film I saw, is a good film. The overstory sounds preposterous but works very well, the characters are possibly too grim but this makes them seem more realistic, and the action is well executed. The philosophy is impressive but also where the film falls short of greatness. Too many questions are left unanswered, and the upbeat conclusion is completely at odds with everything that lead up to it. The film asks us "why is light better than dark?", but doesn't even attempt to answer that, just assumes it is true.

Overall a good film, worth watching, but flawed and ultimately slightly disappointing.

Movies

Journal Journal: The best film I've seen

If, like me, you put off going to see Howl's Moving Castle, go see it right now. It's simply amazing, wonderfully drawn, and incredibly emotive. There are scenes that are truly harrowing, some sad enough to make you cry, a nobility of spirit that will bring a lump to your throat. Watch it, now.

And if you already have, what happens in the first five minutes that I managed to miss? (Everything before the title).

User Journal

Journal Journal: Q: How do you get intellectuals to like a dumb action film?

A: Pretend it's a parody of the dumb action film

I'm sitting here on my own because I really could not stand the film a group of the UK's finest students were about to watch. The Incredibles takes all the worst elements of every bad action film ever, rolls them all together, and expects you to find it hilarious. No, if I want to laugh at a bad film there are plenty of bad films I can do that with. Pixar should go back to making good films. They're much better at it.

News

Journal Journal: Do as we say, not as we do 1

I am amazed that most of today's news sources seem to be accepting the rescue of British troops by breaking them out of an Iraqi prison as a heroic episode. While I can understand the tabloids enjoying saving our brave boys from the evil beturbanned arabs, I'm far less enthusiastic than they and would expect more opposition than has been seen from elsewhere in the media.

Firstly, the British troops in question shot a police officer. That much isn't disputed even by the British authorities. Whilst I can appreciate the need to fit in when going undercover, and am happy to allow undercover troops or police to deal drugs, launder money, maybe even commit minor thefts when it's in the interest of stopping greater crimes, that stops well short of shooting at anyone, yet alone a police officer. Only the truly desperate criminal will kill an officer of the law rather than come quietly, but here are our "brave boys", supposedly the good guys, refusing to answer questions and opening fire when approached.

Second, if the soldiers were guilty they deserve what they get. It is, supposedly, the Iraqis' country, their government is supposed to be running the place, their legal system is supposed to be in charge. If, as the papers seem to be assuming, the soldiers were innocent, then shouldn't we have faith in the Iraqi justice system to clear them? How come the Iraqi government is good enough for Iraqis but not for the British troops? Could it be we don't believe the government is good at all, we're just installing one which will be the best for our interests, the very same policy that lead to Saddam being there and in charge in the first place?

Thirdly, the method of releasing them. The fact that official sources initially denied they'd broken down the walls shows there is at least some shame about this, but really, letting 150 criminals loose because you're worried about your 3 men who were arrested is a bit of an inappropriate response, to say nothing of wanton property destruction. Is the Iraqi prison situation so bad that we believe people would be killed that quickly, and if so, why are we allowing those 150 people to be held there? If they are genuine criminals, what about all the problems they'll now cause for other, innocent Iraqis?

We appear no better than an inner city gang busting da boyz out of the nick, because, y'know, they're da ladz, we stick together. I would expect more concern for other people, and more willingness to consider errors on our part, from the military of a civilised nation, and it seems hipocritical to expect others to accept the authority of the new Iraqi authorities when we are not willing to do so ourselves.

Operating Systems

Journal Journal: Linux 2.6 is unstable 7

I don't care what other people say. I'm sitting here trying to run a vanilla 2.6.12.5 kernel. It crashed four times last evening and has already crashed once this morning in eight minutes of use. Hard lockup, nothing to do but push the reset button and thank god for reiserfs.

No, it's not just X locking up, I've tried SSHing in to no avail.

No, it's not my hardware, my hardware worked fine under 2.4, heck it's more stable than this when I boot win98 on it.

No, it's not my config. I've configured the minimum possible into the kernel, even leaving off some filesystems that I occasionally use, to try and get rid of this freezing. Also, the same config seems to produce a working kernel with 2.6.11, but no other versions.

No, I'm not trolling. I genuinely want to fix this and I can't.

No, I don't work for microsoft. I'm not trying to discredit linux. I just want a working home system and I can't get it.

I'm sick of everyone either denying that I can possibly be having these problems or insisting they're my fault. They're not. I've done everything right and the damn kernel isn't stable. There are many possible points of blame, but to me the fact that the crash was fixed in 2.6.11 and then a new one introduced in 2.6.12 points to the new 2.6 policy of doing development in the stable tree. I don't know if this is right, but I do know that 2.6 is not a stable kernel and should not be released as such.

The Internet

Journal Journal: Internet Fragmentation

I'd make this into a science fiction story if I was a better writer. It's not necessarily going to happen, but it's enough of a risk that people need to be made aware of it.

The days of the Internet as we know it are coming to an end. The squabbling we're currently seeing over the root DANS servers is just the start. Links in the network cost money. Real money, not some theoretical service thing. They're currently provided by either universities as a public service that aids the university academically, or by ISPs where the link benefits both. But the expensive ones like the transatlantic cables are all in the former category. (Feel free to correct me on this.) As more and more content becomes illegal in various places, the universities will retreat, routing only academic content. With the rise of DRAM systems and general improvements in cryptography, eventually only provably academic content will be routed. For the rest, you'll have to find someone else whose interest it serves to forward your packet.

There will be all sorts of innovative money-making schemes from people running server sets. For a monthly fee, companies will guarantee routing from any of their endpoints to any other endpoint. Of course, getting the packet to your local endpoint, and ensuring your recipient can pick it up from theirs, is your business. You might find postal-service-like setups who will deliver "door to door", but I wouldn't count on it, and it will probably be priced per packet. A cadre of hackers will offer free routing anywhere, like in the old days, but it will be unreliable and congested. The spread of wireless adds another dynamic to this, because it allows cheap routes between any two basestations within several kilometres, provided they're willing to cooperate. There could well be several networks layered over each other all around you. Of course encryption technology will be advanced and adopted enough that they are no use to you. The really interesting part will be the half-open networks, those that pass unsigned packets based on automated inspection (manual is impossible with the volume of packets around). These rules will probably change daily, and there will be a new rush of hacking crafting encodings for arbitrary data to go from A to B on. It requires cunning and agility, and can't be used with huge amounts of data, but it's doable. Things might be sent with some of the steps being physically moving discs, or links that only work half the day because they're being run by some kiddie hacker and his friend a few miles off. The current routing protocols won't be able to handle it as well as a competent human, meaning hackers will have an advantage over normal people who simply curse their slow link and hope it will work better next time, or pay for a premier routing service. To send a packet around the world will be a tricky feat, maybe even an induction test for those joining the resurgent hacking gangs. Over time a complete economy will emerge, with exchanges tracking the prices of packets between major locations. Neighbourhoods will lay their own cables to popular servers, and anyone who can provide content people are interested in - probably cracked software/music/movies, now very much a rare commodity with the strong encryption, stronger laws, and slow spread of cracked versions - will be able to get their connections free, maybe even have people pay to connect and charge those who route through them. Networks will form around these hubs, and then dissolve as the operator gets raided, one of the leaf nodes perhaps trying to trade their way with what they managed to acquire before the raid. The canny will stay on the edge, not popular enough to attract attention but popular enough to be able to get what they want, much like posters in mp3 newsgroups today. (If you haven't ever been to such a newsgroup, they're worth watching just for the social dynamics, not to mention the mp3s). Bang paths, UUCP, netnews and local BBSes will all see a revival. It will be a wilderness once more, but a post-apocalyptic one, with older hackers reminiscing about the few decades they had when there was free routing everywhere. Eventually, when wireless evolves to a range of hundreds of miles, free networks may see a return, but the rules of mesh networks dictate that the bigger they get the scarcer bandwidth becomes. As normal Internet bandwidth has increased content has grown to fill the space available (text->images->music->applications and video), and although it's hard to imagine a higher-bandwidth successor to current content it seems inevitable that one will arise, perhaps full 3-d simulations. So the Internet will always be an economic entity, and with the increased power hackers get will come a sadness at the loss of that period of freedom.

Anyone know if anyone has tried to write about this kind of idea?

User Journal

Journal Journal: There was a wrong question on my physics paper

I'm sure of it. Today's (16th June) OCR A level physics paper, the Field and Particle physics one, question 11b. Very much a schoolboy error - the question setter had used nanograms and then assumed that meant *10^-9 in formulae. Unfortunately, thanks to a historical quirk related to the french revolution, the kilogram is actually the base unit, so nanograms are *10^-12. Anyone else notice this? More to the point, anyone know what happens about it? Should I complain to the exam board? How are such things marked? Or did I do something stupid and there's another explanation.
User Journal

Journal Journal: Yet another ROTS review

Went to see it yesterday. Like AOTC, I feel it's worth watching once but doesn't stand up compared to the originals. Whilst I have attempted to avoid spoilers I make no guarantees.

The Good

Hurrah! Hayden has - just about - learned to talk! He still sounds flat and wooden, but at least it's a human degree of flat and wooden, not the previous computer-beating monotone. He's not up to love scenes but some of the conversations with Obi-Wan manage to sound almost genuine. There's a person underneath there, at least, and he seeps through occasionally.

The spaceships. At the start of the film we see a genuine fleet engagement, although mostly from the perspective of a few fighters one gets a sense of two full lines of battle, with ponderous cruisers exchanging tremendous firepower.

The Bad

"General Grievous". I mean, really. That sounds like the villian out of a kiddie cartoon. No, it's worse than that. It sounds like the villan from a set of action figures. Would it really have cost too much to get someone to find him a proper name?

Kenobi. He's now much nicer to Anakin, far friendlier. This is good, but it's happened at the wrong time. In the last movie he was patronising and didn't seem very close to Anakin, who nevertheless stuck by him. This time he really loves him, and yet he turns from him.

Portman's voice. Somehow she's gone from queen to council estate. Maybe it's just too much time around Christiansen.

The Ugly

The dialog. We know what to expect by now. Urgh.

The plot. The macro-plot is actually fairly good, with the collapse of the republic making simplistic but striking points about society. But anakin is just not believeable or human enough.

User Journal

Journal Journal: Here we go again 2

Fate told me something today. I'm not quite sure what, yet, but I know there was something important.

I forgot my violin, and my music. This used to be something that happened fairly frequently. But this morning I was making a special effort to remember it. This wasn't a random event, it was important.

I was expecting to play the violin with a particular girl for the last time. And I was expecting to play the music to another. Now I have done neither. I feel there must be a reason for this. Things don't happen to me without a good reason for them, especially when they are things which are important to me.

Gosh, that sounds awful.

KDE

Journal Journal: OK, I take it back

Amarok has now learned what I like - well, fairly well anyway - and I must say I'm really appreciating it. All the integrated things like lyrics and cover management really add to the experience. It seems a very good player. I wonder when this, K3b and Kaffeine will make it into the main KDE tree. I think they all should. Amarok is a superior replacement for JuK in almost every way, it seems a shame to lose a program so quickly after it was introduced but that's the way things are. K3b there is no excuse for leaving out, it's one of the best showcases for K3b, being the best cd burning program on linux. Kaffeine makes a good competitor to Gnome's totem, using a lot of KDE technology with kparts, the universal sidebar, system tray interface etc. With Kaffeine installed viewing web videos in konqueror becomes painless, having it part of the main KDE tree would finally make out of the box video playback on linux a reality.
KDE

Journal Journal: Why the fuss?

Looked at Amarok again today, and I was distinctly underwhelmed. The global shortcuts are a nice touch, but for everything else it seems to be just another media player. Why is everyone so excited about this? Heck, it was featured here a few weeks ago.

I use and write plugins for noatun, so I'm more than a little biased, but I really don't see what Amarok offers above it, and the absence of a plugin system seems very shortsighted. Its database features may be slightly useful, but they don't update automatically as far as I can tell, making it far less useful in that respect than juk. I'm not certain this is the case, because amarok frequently crashes when attempting to add a folder to the database. The UI is to my eyes horribly nonintuitive, and less well integrated with kde than either of the other programs I've mentioned, though arguably better looking because of it. It may have more features initially, although most of them seem gimmicky to me, but the lack of plugins means it has less overall and including everything anyone wants will make it horribly bloated, while leaving things out will mean most users will feel there is at least one thing it is missing.

So, can some of its fans explain the big attraction?

X

Journal Journal: Fun with dual-head

As I write this I have finally got a dual-headed system up and running. My sig's semi-ironic begging for a geforce2 unexpectedly paid off; props to cannon fodder 0109 who sent me one. As this was a PCI card, I decided to get down a monitor from my attic and set up a dual-head system.

My first troubles appear to be due to two of my PCI slots not working. Is this normal, perhaps a result of me firmly shoving a pci card just beside the slot I was aiming for? Or is it a cause for concern.

Anyway, after removing my winmodem and rearranging my other cards (the fan on this card makes the two pci slots next to it unuseable) I was able to delve into the fun that is X configuration. My initial manual efforts proved futile, while running xorgcfg yielded a working dual-head system, but with my AGP card only running at 640x480. With a little investigation I determined this to be because of the monitor, however no amount of fiddling would persuade it to run at higher resolution. I eventually hit on the bright idea of searching for the model (taxan multi vision 875) to find out what the settings could be. No luck; all I could find was specs and config for the later + and + LR versions. However, I copied the xf86config for a +LR and discovered that although the default mode was too high for this monitor, other modes worked. Some of them looked pretty good. So then it was time to binary search for the maximum HSync. I'm not sure if there is a proper way to do this, but by reducing the max hsync by 8kHz I got a monitor that worked immediately in 1024x768. I turned down my primary monitor (on the new pci card) from 1152x864 to match this and enabled xinerama, which is very nice. (As a linux user, I can choose whether to have independent desktops or a single stretched one). As a Gentoo user I was expecting to have to recompile kde with USE=xinerama, but was pleasantly surprised to find that it already had support. The extra space comes in really handy and kde is set up to take advantage of it nicely, although noatun keeps displaying the track in the bottom-right corner of the left screen rather than the right one, even though kopete puts notifications there with no difficulty. Hmm.

So there I was, feeling all smug, and I rebooted only to find my second screen horribly positioned up and to the left on the monitor. It had been like that at first, but I'd just adjusted it, but it seems to snap back whenever I change video modes. Hopefully it will acquire a "memory" for the right position, I've had monitors that do this for a little while after being brought out of storage, but in the meantime it's rather a pain to have to keep readjusting the thing for 3 minutes each boot. Anyone got any suggestions?

Slashdot Top Deals

Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?

Working...