Comment Re:So, it's a "conspiracy" if its about a Democrat (Score 1) 168
Wouldn't have said anything different if I were replying to your brother, fustakrakich.
Why do you follow those people?
Why do you strawman like you fell out o' the Wizard of Oz? "Don't bother, it was rhetorical..."
If you are against allowing homosexual couples and individuals exactly the same rights and privileges as heterosexual couples and individuals, you are a bigot!
Exactly the same? Exactly the same? They have exactly the same opportunity to do exactly the same things that any heterosexual couple does.
I understand that you're exercising "the rule of law as an instrument of human redemption".
I understand that, mathematically, you're saying 2+2=5, for small values of 5, and if I don't toe your line, => I <= am some kind of socially reprehensible bigot, and I'm supposed to feel all bad and stuff about being Politically Incorrect, and any evil things that happen to me are my fault for refusing to buy your ersatz gospel.
My only ask of you is for the development underlying 2+2=5. On my way to the gallows for defending the truth, I should like to peruse your proof for form not following function.
No H8, just idle curiosity.
The main reason why I don't consider this to be a "sane" web site is because they refuse to acknowledge their profound bend towards conservatism.
Well, this is certainly not a social conservative website, and thus comes off as more libertarian to me.
demonstrably more conservative
I guess if you think #OccupyResoluteDesk is conservative, then you probably think Bernie Sanders is right of center. I'm curious if you could offer an example of a "sane" web site.
You wish to deny a certain group of people their rights to a contract.
Untrue. You cannot name a specific context, people, or right which I have sought to deny anyone at any time.
But don't let facts interrupt your bullying effort, which is pretty much how I view this soapbox of yours.
One man's constant is another man's variable. -- A.J. Perlis
