Comment Re:Students + Anonimity (Score 1) 234
Who stole your account?
Who stole your account?
ARE YOUR CLASSMATES JEW-^h^h^h COMMU-^h^h^h^h^h RAPISTS? Don't delay, speak out today! Report suspected sedi -^h^h^h^h sexual assaulters to Big Brother! Remember citizens, it is for YOUR protection!
ARE YOUR CLASSMATES JEW-^h^h^h COMMU-^h^h^h^h^h RAPISTS? Don't delay, speak out today! Report suspected sedi-^h^h^h^h sexual assaulters to Big Brother! Remember citizens, it is for YOUR protection!
Hillary won't buy votes with money, she'll buy them with fear and hate by painting everyone who doesn't kiss the ring as a horrible misogynist rape culture neckbeard fedora beta dudebro pissbaby fuckboy womanhater.
Even the highest fines anyone's given out so far are still marginal enough to be considered the cost of doing business for the penalized corporation.
I was thinking the same thing. Maybe the real measurement here is that when you feel shitty you're not gonna be as happy even if you're on a painkiller.
Unless mechanics prevent them by some hard method any sufficiently analyzable game will inevitably result in nothing but draws between two sufficiently skilled players. There will be variation on an individual level of course, nobody plays at the top of their game all the time, but as a whole the larger trend will be towards universal stalemates. Only games where mechanics do not permit stalemates by optimal play will avoid this.
God dammit... alright I'll give you credit for actually getting me with that one you motherfucker...
Yeah about that: There is no gender gap in tech salaries
it makes as much sense as assuming tall people will be bad shoe salesmen because theyre too far from the ground.
And maybe a world class neurosurgeon is a terrible surgeon because he secrets death causing enzymes from his earlobes. I can make up excuses to justify things too.
You are basically a liar at this point. You know very well that I'm referring to your original claim about PopeRatzo, because I've told you. You keep on pretending that it's a different claim and trying to prove that. In other words you are trying to deceive me about your orginal claim
You, PopeRatzo, and Animojo at the grustrag three of social justice here in slashdot. All three of you blatantly cheerlead for what passes for feminism these days. You don't get to wave a warbanner and then say "oh but not when it's inconvenient!".
And I note that you STILL haven't provided evidence. You do know that the burden of providing evidence is on the person making the claim right? Simply saying "there is evidence go and find it" makes you look like a fool.
I'm not saying "it's out there go and find it" I'm literally saying "It's right fucking here". Do you want it in MLA? APA? Chicago? Turabian? Because at this point what you're doing is literally the equivalent of looking at a works cited page and saying there's no evidence provided. I can give you a citation, it's on you to actually GO TO IT.
This must be what it feels like being in the twilight zone. It's right there Serviscope. I'm not making bald claims. I'm pointing at the evidence and saying it's right there, just go to the goddamn website and look at it.
So what you're saying is you have a full citation, you know exactly where the data is, but because of your own arbitrary reasons (javascript and whatever else you come up with next) you refuse to follow through on your side of this and actually look at the data.
I can give you a citation, I can't make you actually look at it.
He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion
