Exactly what I came here to post. Fiat-Chrysler reported a net income of about six times this fee for three months alone. This isn't a fine, it's a tiny insignificant operating expense.
And the overwhelming majority of the people that are working are not in that position.
Daemonik is arguing against somebody who's couching an argument against regulating industries for the safety of consumers in a false air of liberty and freedom. Drinkypoo tried to classify Daemonik's rebuttal of an extremist libertarian/republican "corporations shouldn't have to follow laws" position with claims it was a false dichotomy.
Yes, they can. There's nothing stopping a company from replacing an employee but its a lot more difficult for an employee to replace their employer.
Your logical fallacy is the False Compromise. When someone wants to cut off someone else's arm the second person is not being unreasonable when they refuse to settle on having their arm cut off at the elbow instead, nor are they making a false dichotomy by pointing out the non-evil choice is not cutting off people's arms.
Companies can fire anyone at any time. People can't simply hire themselves into any position at any time.
Don't forget lying and misleading answers. Wu was flat out given hundreds of thousands of dollars by her parents to start her "company" and uses her patreon to buy expensive motorcycles.
That's exactly the problem... nobody goes to jail. Start jailing board members and executives and shit will change REAL fast.
No, they really don't. The whole point is that critic reviews are if anything incredibly shallow, essentially little more than hipsterish circlejerks.
Because even the single most toxic sub on the entire website which openly tries to goad at-risk users into committing suicide, routinely engages in doxing, and considers brigading to be a core part of their sub's existence still has the favor of the admins.
SRS would brigade the shit out of the system making it useless.
Voat can barely keep up with the constantly increasing demand even without taking the constant DoS attacks into account, and they're starting to pull in outside funding.
How many times have we seen this with everything from Ant-Man to the same issue in the other direction with Far Cry 2? "Critics" hate something because it doesn't pander to their agenda while people love it, or they fall over each other fellating it because it does pander to their agenda or they got paid while actual consumers despise it because it's crap.
The solution is to simply say that you can't retroactively immunize someone for violating the constitution, it is by definition as illegal and invalid as the original act.
"The four building blocks of the universe are fire, water, gravel and vinyl." -- Dave Barry
