Note, too: you completely ignored my procedural point. Another "conspiracy" cop-out. *sigh*

Because the Iranians have always been so honest and stuff.
Note, too: you completely ignored my procedural point.

I mean, I stipulated in the JE that I doubt I'll actually see it. Why would I pay someone to waste ~2hrs of my life?

Oh, I already have, baby.

"'A liar AND a thief'? There may be an uncertainty principle at work here," said Heisenberg.

But -40C feels colder than -40F

We really have to put some newspaper under you, for moments when you overflow like this. To drop the current egregious example, the Iran deal Congressional shortcutting, and taking the sell-out straight to the Untied Nations is not even "kinda" conservative. In a rational time (and this sure as balls ain't) this particular stunt would be more impeachy than simply peachy.

You've got to understand: it's unlikely I'll watch this. The real pleasure is watching the usual suspects melt down.

Is that like when you try to typecast #OccupyResoluteDesk to "conservative", or do you have some other meaning in mind?

No. Earnest? Maybe. Serious? No.

Shorter d_r: "It is better to whinge on about peripheral matters than face the reality that I have supported abject cretins."

An article with this level of simple insight would never get published on Slashdot.

You need to add a conspiracy:

Diesel is only available because ... big oil pushes diesel and bribes politicians to keep it available. Refining oil into gasoline without also producing diesel creates a byproduct with infinite energy per liter. If they stopped making diesel fuel, the oil companies would all go out of business.

Also a problem for cycling: snow. (Yes, I know it's possible to ride a bicycle in the snow -- but it is objectively unwise.)

The first thought I had was that I hope they don't do it because it'll only be used to invade our privacy.

LK

I've shared the extend of what I know. If there was a deeper meaning to "Who?" I regret taking the question straightly.