No, you just failed at formatting.

My favorite are all the fucking goomoji in the subjects these days. "||mail.google.com/mail/e/" made a welcome addition to my uBlock filters...

The supplier who gave them bad or subgrade steel should be, they're about to get reamed...

Heard on NPR this morning that they think it's an inside job, and has all the hallmarks of it being so.

Apparently someone got tired of the all unethical behavior. Something about an account being free to create, but $20 to delete (and then not really being removed, or something like that)

Oh. To answer your question - I've recorded at 96khz and played it back at 1/4 speed, and I don't recall seeing a dead zone on the resulting audible spectrum. So I couldn't say anything about 48khz and beyond, and I'll also caution I was hardly being scientific about it.

If I had anything that could reliably produce a sweep up there, I'd work on creating a graph for you. Sadly, I don't :|

Not bad for a cheap recorder, though. Even the battery life is nice. The -only- problem I have with it is the chassis is 'noisy' - I have a bit of paper towel wedged between the battery and the battery access panel, to keep it from rattling. If you're not handling it actively, it's quiet.

My $100 recorder picks up bird songs well beyond 20kHz. Doesn't seem to be aliasing either, as the pitch changes move harmonically and in the same direction as the stuff lower down that we can hear.

Don't forget... They didn't build the A-10 and decide to put the GAU-8 in it - they took the GAU-8 and gave it wings. It's hard to beat that kind of focused purpose.

Does this mean there's some sort of hardware ID magic that happens when you use an OEM copy, or is this saying you must have an OEM copy for the tool to work?

Shame you can't make an image of MS' activation servers, too, because that's the problem.

The kind of car I drive doesn't even "shift."

Well, so it has engaged, engaged-reverse, and disengaged. Doesn't count.

What is "heel-toe?"

I'd prefer they shipped uBlock Origin instead, far lighter and works just as well.

No, DICE. I will not watch your videos. I don't care how long (or short) they are.

I think eventually, yes. Just as we are not able to sense the vast majority of EM radiation, we mapped the spectrum and can sense most of it - and all we started with was detection of radiative heat and visual light.

I do think it would have taken much longer to arrive at the understandings we currently hold, but I don't think being able to see visible light was critical to arrive where we are. We would come up with ways to communicate and think about information with the senses we had.