I know perfectly well what freedom is and I come from the land where at least some people understood what freedom was for them even though it was taken away from them by collectivists, just like you. Eventually by hook or crook they off killed enough people there to paralyse the future generations enough so they would go with the garbage collectivist propaganda. Of-course lately some people decided that they want their own version of freedom, which obviously led to another attack by yet more collectivist government forces.

In any case the only people that are truly immature and ignorant are those, who use government violence as a proxy for their own gain and you are included.

Freedom is protection against oppression by the collective, that's what freedom is. As to me being a teenager, ha, I wish. You on the other hand are not a human individual the way I see it, you would be much happier in an insect colony.

You are the fucking moron, there shouldn't be such a concept as a 'public road' in the first place. Government doesn't belong in any property or business or money and should not be allowed to force people to buy into or participate in any programs whatsoever. As I said: you can't understand what an individual is, you are a termite.

I should have added: I have 0 interest in paying for anybody else's service under the gun of a government thug.

A person breaks their arm and can't pay for a hospital service, that's not hospital's or my problem. They SHOULD have money to pay for it, they can ASK FAMILY to help them, they can ASK for CHARITY to pay for it, they can put it on CREDIT.

There are many many things a person should be doing, NONE of those things involves using guns, including proxy guns of a government.

If I break my arm, I will go to the hospital and pay for the service, unlike you obviously, who doesn't understand that concept.

You are wrong of-course in every possible way, you are on the side of taking away people's choices before they are able to exercise them. You are on the side of oppression the moment a human being makes it into this world and until the moment he exits.

You know, it's unfortunate that you exist in the same plane of this Universe with me, we just don't belong on the same planet or in the same species, you are clearly not an individual human being as far as I am concerned. You would be much more at home in a colony of termites or some such.

Well, key architect, Jonathan Gruber says otherwise back in 2012.

You know, you really have to question your own biases and assumptions before telling people they are lying or whatever.

Actually at the heart of the matter is the entire concept of individual freedom. I know, it's not popular with the mob to talk about individual freedom, in a mob there are no individuals, thus - the mob.

However though my argument always falls on deaf ears I will not stop making it. It is the freedom of the individual that is at stake every time the collective (the mob, the majority and their violent armed proxy force known as the government) decides to impose more rules, the fewer individual freedoms are left untouched by this violence and oppression.

And it is violence and oppression. I would not pay 1 penny in income, wealth and any form of income redistributing taxes if it were not for so called 'legal' and 'legitimate' violence of the state. But the state derives its authority from the governed, so I hear. But the governed supposedly do not themselves have the right to steal from each other, to imprison each other and to murder each other. Yet the government has this authority. So what gives the government this authority? Clearly the governed do not have that power, so how can they give that power if they themselves don't have it? Well they cannot. The entire concept is absurd and as far as I am concerned illegal, illegitimate, immoral.

My point is: the government itself doesn't actually have the authority to delegate who is allowed to do what for living, to instrument licenses, to legislate business and labour, to control and legislate money, any of it. As long as I exist on this planet I see all of it as illegitimate and as such I will never respect any of it, nor will I agree with it and I see it as my primary objective to deny any and all governments any and all authority over me.

As such my position is that it is the most important moral imperative to undermine all government activities and laws in every way.

And the problem with not stealing property from people is???? I get it, we want to steal as a society, apparently society agreed that it consists of unbelievable pieces of total puke laden shit induced gangrenous fish cunts and not people, who are absolutely on board for any kind of theft possible and they want the government with guns to go and do the dirty work on their behalf. Apparently they want to seem 'legit' while doing it. Dirtbags.

- unclear? What was unclear about using taxes to beat individual States into submission? It was exceedingly clear that Congress put language into the law on purpose to force States to set up their own exchanges or be subject to taxes without getting any benefits from them. That was as clear as day.

Some States called the bluff of the Congress on this crap and SCOTUS bailed Congress out. It was never unclear, it was perfectly clear and SCOTUS knowingly broke the law.

The country should not be known as the United States of America at all, there is nothing United about it. It should be known as the IDA - ILLEGAL Dictatorship of America.

- or as they said in 1984: war is peace. "To be free of payment for a service" is not at all the same thing as to be free from government oppression. "To be free of payment for a service" = provide government with tools of oppression to take from somebody else to pay for my service, to allow government to steal, imprison and murder people so that I can have the service I feel entitled to.

"To be free" does not mean not to have to pay for your own life's needs and choices, it means not to have other people dictate to you how you live, but clearly you don't know that.

- the only reason to not burn all of your savings by the life end is to pass it to your own children and survivors, not to some unknown to you people, that makes no sense at all. I am going to argue that anybody who owns any property should be able to exercise complete control over that property without having any taxes charged by any government whatsoever and this means they must be able to pass that property to anybody whatsoever of their choosing and it is none of government's or the mob's business. But of-course the mob uses the oppression of the government to do their dirty work for them, to steal from a minority to subsidise themselves. It's is immoral and economically unsound behaviour and it is 'legalized' by the corrupt system that exists.

I feel the need. The need to provide a competing to Google play store site where any and all activities will be allowed.

Google has their right to control their private property, which is what their site is. Other people may have different opinions on their own sites. Of course the phone or tablet has to be unjailed from Google prison.

Ok, if you want to defend your idea of what people should be doing with their own health and money based on some socialist ideology that's one thing, but stop fucking lying, unless you are so misinformed that you don't know that the way this wording in this 'law' was drafted was to ensure that the individual States fall in line by promising to use their money to subsidise other States if they themselves didn't participate in what the Feds wanted.

This fucking illegal piece of shit law passed ONLY due to the language that you now call 'poorly drafted', if that language wasn't there this piece of shit illegal law could not pass.

USA should be known as Illegal States of America specifically because it is not a nation of laws but a nation of men.

The 3 judges who went against the ILLEGAL law were trying to preserve the nation of laws, the people on the bench who for political reasons upheld the illegal law have crossed the t and dotted the i for you.

USA doesn't exist, now it's ISA.

How are financial transactions not free speech? If I want to be able to BUY A PRODUCT or to DONATE MONEY I should not be forced to disclose any of that information to a government agency just because they want to know what I like to buy, read, use, whatever.

That is absolutely free speech, ultimately all of the freedoms that people think are important are completely useless and fall flat on their face if the most important freedom - freedom to earn money, freedom to spend money is not actually protected from government oppression.

You think being able to spend or earn money without being oppressed is somehow outside of individual freedom protections because it's money? Money, time, any possessions are worth nothing if you do not have protections against government oppression, which means you cannot be protected from government taking anything it wants away from you, preventing you from doing stuff to earn a living (and I am not talking about harming others while earning a living, that's the purview of criminal justice system).

Being able to stop you from advertising your services because some government official wants to own that piece of business for himself or for a donor... THAT is what individual rights are - protection against government oppression. A right is protection against government oppression and only government oppression. A right has nothing to do with transactions and dealings between individuals and / or companies.

Why is that? Because government is an institution that has supposedly legal and legitimate power to oppress you! No corporation, no other individual has legal and legitimate power to oppress you. A private individual (or a company) oppressing you is a matter for courts and justice systems, but a government oppressing you is a matter of policy and governance and nobody in government will ever be punished for oppressing you, so you have to prevent the oppression from happening, you cannot rely or expect retribution after the fact.

The only meaningful individual rights have to do with preventing government oppression against taking your stuff and your freedom and your life.

Any move to deanonymize any activity that has nothing to do with harming others is a move towards government oppression.