Comment Re:Symmetry is beautiful (Score 1) 94
To reference the initial post in this thread: Just like the orbit of planets.
To reference the initial post in this thread: Just like the orbit of planets.
I understand the FCC is looking at new regulations.
But, I am of the opinion that the President should encourage the FCC to make the internet common carrier.
That's what this petition asked the President to do.
He can't just order it, but he can sure as hell meet with the guy he appointed to the position and encourage him to take action.
But he's not going to and it not inclined to do that.
To bad your insults don't help either. Obama could meet with his appointed head of the FCC and strongly encourage him to make the internet common carrier.
Fuck, Obama can call him on his phone and have the FCC do it with their pen.
Its one thing he CAN actually in this case do all by himself.
But it would be for the good of the citizens, and not the cable and telecom industries, so it isn't going to happen.
I am so fucking fed up with the citizens getting screwed no matter what.
They tried this "idiots interface" before, what makes them think Metro will end up faring better than that failed attempt? Hi Bob!
Also, so you train an entire GENERATION of people how to use the start menu and then you take it away to make the system EASIER to use.
They volunteered for the damn job by running for office! You're damn right it's their problem to solve.
Five years ago Obama told us that when we elected him, he would solve these problems.
The fact that we're calling him out on the shit job he is doing is not Bush's fault.
Sure the problems are hard to solve, but Obama was sold to is as a messiah. He has proven unable to live up to that billing.
Great. But those energy sources can't meet the demand yet, and the only zero emissions energy source that will work right now is vetoed by the environmentalists every time it's mentioned.
Do they want to really solve this problem or not?
So, Kerry was implying federal intervention in international affairs.
The original poster was saying the Feds wouldn't intervene in a situation involving purely national affairs.
It sounds to me like they have a solution that involves restricting the river technologically, but the Democrats don't like technological solutions, they prefer regulatory solutions and taxes.
it's safe to assume that the reverse is possible as well
Yes, the reverse is actually the basis for the transporter.
Nature does not pollute itself.
WTF? I mean seriously WTF?
Have you ever seen a volcano? Nature - polluting.
We have evidence of asteroid strikes that caused massive extinctions by - massively polluting the atmosphere. - Nature
Nature doesn't pollute. Bzzzt, wrong.
People have been selling the idea that our civilization is doomed for centuries:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L...
No, you're not doing your merger math right.
0 + 1 = -1
Paul is saying that there are parts he doesn't like, he's not saying that they should be violated.
I don't like the income tax myself, that doesn't mean that I don't pay it since its the law.
But the government is violating our fourth amendment rights right now.
So not liking the 16th or 17th amendments means that you have to sit idly by while the government erases the 4th???
Your post is confusing we.
"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra
