I can guarantee he didn't think of them the same way they thought of him. Completely different philosophical and metaphysical underpinnings to the theology, Jesuits are anti-Islamics.

My question is, if ISIL, just for a second, isn't a CIA plant, what makes them think a few beheadings will STOP the bombings? Given the evil of American Secularism, it is far more likely to turn the Levant into tritonite than it is to stop anything at all.

Which is why environmentalists need to get on board with isolationists and localists about charging per-container-mile shipping taxes.

My point is that this "reward" sounds a heck of a lot like the tail end of This STTOS series.

And apparently, keep doing it for 1.3 million years....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eA78e7Vh_XE

You may have seen tables of various isotopes of Hydrogen and Helium, those seem to match predictions very well, and there are more than 2 of them, which may be why you are thinking it may go above 2 in the atomic table.

The model can give a "quite accurate" expected value, even when wrong. Example (note numbers are completely made up):

Say there is model A which predicts 2.5-2.6% lithium.

Say there is another model B which predicts 2%-8% lithium.

Say in reality there is 1% lithium.

Both models are apprently wrong. But Model A is more "accurate" in making the wrong prediction. Therefore the text in the article is perfectly correct.

Get it?

Get rid of your dictator and adopt a representative democracy and it will be over. Indeed, nobody could have thought it would go on this long.

The "upgrade" to Hubble could have been accomplished more cheaply by launching another Hubble.

Actually it will be a lot worse than Venus and due to a different cause in that the sun would actually be irradating many times more energy on it, and possibly even engulfing it in hot plasma. Venus is heated by the insulation of a huge amount of CO2, the Earth with that much CO2 would be equally hot, and Venus without it would be just a tropical Earth. And when the sun expands the CO2 will be irrelevant (I would think the heat would actually make it escape to space), not that that is going to help any.

The ones I was tracking did so about 3 miles.

I don't know if this is a troll, but if not you may be a bit confused about who is "falling for this". It seems you are as you just listed a few outright lies and distortions.

If you believe the environmental cost of making a new car exceeds the savings of using it instead of an old car, then you are the one that is duped. This has been debunked many times. Guess the person who thinks they are 'smart' is you.

Shoulder pads with big batteries and solar panels? Then we could all look like we come from the 24th century Romulan Empire!

All of which is greater than 11mph.....the speed of the automobile traffic in New York City.

Having said that, I used to drive a Honda Spree. I've *clocked* bicycles doing 30 in 25mph zones.