When you are getting so many death threats, you are obviously doing something wrong.

That none of them were followed through on doesn't make them not credible. Credible is a measure of possible, not likely. Just because there was a low chance, doesn't mean it wasn't a threat that was impossible to carry out.

Do you have a cite? Seriously. You obviously haven't worked in retail (at least as anything other than cashier). The stores have categories they wish to fill. They ask Nerf for "girls toys" and nerf either sends their boy toys to the girl isle, sends nothing, or sends girl toys. Given that "regular Nerf" ends up on the boys isle, and "Nerf Rebelle" ends up only on the girls isle, Nerf, not the store, decided that "Nerf" is boys only, and "Nerf Rebelle" is girls only. The store didn't object, but didn't make that choice themselves.

For your statement to be true, the distribution network for Lego would have to be unlike every other toy on the planet.

Outrageous claims demand at least some evidence. I think you made a large number of simply wrong assumptions about retail, then are relying on assumptions (that the store places items, regardless of the wishes of the distributors) that are wrong, and coming to the wrong conclusion based on wrong assumptions. Your logic is sound, which is why you are unwilling to listen to anyone else, but your assumptions are based on common sense, not fact.

So stores don't go to makers and request "girs clothes" and get sent pink? The store would ask makers for "girls clothes" and get sent boys clothes in a girls cut/sizing, then the store, fed up with the options given, go out and make their own?

Reality conflicts with your opinion. I know which one I believe more.

I never saw that claim.

Not according to the reports from Vietnam.

Or someone that opened the profile of the person sending the tweets (no search needed) who opened a "private window" to see it without revealing their personal info. Yes, it takes "forethought" but took me about 2 seconds to do (two clicks, once you are looking at an "offending" tweet).

Yes, and if US troops landed and shot those Russians, it would be Ukranian forces attacking rebels, not Americans shooting Russians, regardless of who pulls the trigger and who dies.

The "cliche" is the person that asserts anything they don't like is "force" and everything else is justified after, merely "counter-force" and not an initiation of force in response to speech.

So if force (or the initiation thereof) is wrong to the Libertarians, and speech is force, then all libertarians must be against "free speech", Right?

And yes, you are the first person I've seen who asserted that speech is force.

You are confusing reality with political reality.

Not in the minds of those ordering the fighting. When a Soviet killed an American in Vietnam, the NVA did it. The Soviets weren't shooting at us, the NVA/VC was shooting at the South Vietnamese. It just happened that the NVA shooting was Soviet, and the South Vietnamese army member killed was American.

Yes, Russia, under the USSR, bred out the Ukrainians. Crimea is a little different because it's often not been Ukrainian. But there were Russian palaces on the Crimean peninsula, so obviously some claims. The people I know from the Ukraine hare the Russians. The only Ukrainians that don't hate the Russians are Russians.

No, it wouldn't.

Yeah, it had nothing to do with the massive miss management for years. They spent more time trying to legislate out foreign makers, rather than trying to make cars people wanted. But that has nothing to do with their decline.

Tautology U has taught you well. Prove women don't participate for reasons other than bias.

If the reason women don't participate is because women are more likely to have their edits reverted when people see they are done by a feminine name, then the choosing to not participate is based in bias. Asserting your preferred answer doesn't change reality, no matter how much you want it to.

Chickipedia?

You don't need the remote if you have physical access.