unfortunately... this.
i'm not a programmer. i can't code anything. but when i see people wiring code and not bothering with any tests for it, i feel sad, because i am seeing way too many regressions in basic functionality that could be caught by a couple of simple tests.
in addition to passing these problems to users, it is also demotivating for other participants of a project that does not do proper test development. and i do not see a solution to this problem.

can we hope that this means all hardware being perfectly supported by linux ?

actually, that show was transported back in time. it was shot on titan

loved the "Adorable Ponzi Scheme game" part. registered on a latvian domain, too. gotta buy !!!1111one

this is wrong (besides the crap grammar) - multi-year contracts are just that - contracts. there is no need to force lockin because of that. anything else is anti-competitive practice

...and then companies will start creating their own collections of publicly available photos.
a better outcome would be accepting parties as a good thing :)

unfortunately, the drafts are not available (booo), but i would expect them to standardise connector + voltage. that way you could use lower-power charger to charge a lager device barely/slower, but at least somehow :)

pfft. lions. we're talking about ice insects from outer space here

actually, louis is a minority of those who do say words fully. and the point in citing him was to note how saying "n-word" is so incredibly stupid and useless :)
everybody knows what you meant there. it is no better than just saying "nigger" and being done with it.

oh, that's bullshit. or you missed the point. why skip the full word, why hide behind a substitute ?
or, as louis ck put it, why try to plant it in the listeners' minds ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dF1NUposXVQ

or what about the interesting phenomena where black people may use word "nigger", but others (caucasians, asians, indians etc) may not ?

it's not the only example, of course, but one that seems to illustrate the state of censorship in the usa fairly well.

they don't say it because they are afraid. whether they are afraid from corporations or govt makes little effective difference. also, "in the right context" means "self-censoring a bit less"...

and this is the great thing about america - some americans will rationalise everything to show how america is the greatest and how any problems pointed out actually are GREAT :)

(and i do think the american self-censorship regime is slightly better than govt-imposed censorship. i just can't agree with it being all fine and dandy)

as i noted in another comment, does it make that much difference whether it's self censorship because you fear consequences by corporations as opposed to consequences from a government ? :)

sure self censorship is not exactly the same. but does it make that much difference in the end ? :)

why do american "news" people say "n-word" ?

what fun can you make out of "press 1 for English" ?