Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Jerk off material for the Greenies (Score 4, Informative) 96

There's no smoke here, nor is there burning.

You're not burning the stuff, you're gassifying it, which is an entirely different thing. The latter uses a low-oxygen environment and no combustion.

From that gasification, you get hydrogen and carbon monoxide ("synthesis gas"), which you feed into a Fisher-Tropsch process, with the end result being diesel fuel you can pour into the city buses or sell or whatever.

Comment Re:context (Score 2) 164

Failures were correlated with the amount of time the disk was spun up, so you should idle a drive not in active use.

That makes no logical sense unless the statement is missing a "not" somewhere, or unless you WANT failures.

You're reading the sentence wrong. You're reading it as "Times the disk was spun up".

What they mean is the total amount of time the disk has spent spinning over its lifetime.

Comment Re:Only 22% (Score 1) 377

Highway mileage? Hybrids are don't do anything for highway. The battery and motor may as well be ballast for highway driving, so you'll get identical highway mileage, at best (more probably, slightly worse) compared to an otherwise identical conventional vehicle.

If you're doing mostly highway, a hybrid has no benefit for you.

Hybrids only do anything for stop-and-go city driving, where they shine pretty nicely, largely due to not idling.

Comment Re:They'll probably see a spike soon (Score 1) 377

With the coming $4.50+/gallon gas coming this summer due to the combination of Ukrain and Iraq (plus screw you, we're big oil) I think you'll see sales jump up again.

Yeah, but new conventional vehicles are awfully close to hybrids in terms of fuel economy, without the extra cost. And then fuck-everything-we're-doing-full-electric is eating into the hybrid's market share from the other side.

Comment Re:Let gay men donate (Score 1) 172

Wow, OK. So if you don't think giving donors the run around will increase donations then you are the bigoted, homophobic ... etc.

Run around? "Test everyone for everything" is the standard up here and there's no "run around". They just take a half dozen vials of blood in addition to the unit, all through the same needle.

They first fill a little bag with blood (it's all integrated into the donation pack), then they clamp off that line and direct the blood to the main collection bag and fill the vials from the first bag while you fill the big one. It adds maybe a minute to the collection. The actual testing is all done after donation. If the testing shows something important, you get a letter in the mail.

Comment Re:Let gay men donate (Score 1) 172

HIV testing isn't cheap and forcing it on everyone would shrink the donor pool dramatically not increase it.

Sure it is. Canadian Blood Services tests every single blood donation for HIV (also Hep C, West Nile, and others). The testing is done after the fact, so there's no waiting or anything. They just take a half dozen vials of blood in addition to the unit.

Comment Re:Fuck IPv6 (Score 1) 305

Sure, it's possible. You can make a system that bases itself off any byte/word size you like, but why do something non-standard just because? Numbers of bits that are powers of two is the norm and there's no particularly good reason to go against that. It would simply add expense, which would hamper adoption.

Slashdot Top Deals

I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.

Working...