Comment Re:Discover life? (Score 2) 221
So, is fire alive? A key qualification has to be heredity, otherwise you can't rule out simple chemical reactions like fire.
So, is fire alive? A key qualification has to be heredity, otherwise you can't rule out simple chemical reactions like fire.
Have we yet built a self-replicating robot? (without cheating)
"Hey underling, do you work for a moron?"
Obviously, when individuals start paying Big Data to work for them.
Speak for yourself. I want a smart home and self driving car.
right?
Basically, if you are simply acting in accordance to already existing unequal systems, then it is exploitative, even if people don't feel exploited. It takes a proactive stance, not a neutral stance, to combat exploitation. It's understandable that people from poorer countries will gladly accept lower wages and will be thankful for opportunities granted by a multinational corporation. Probably they are better off for it. Nevertheless, the corporation is still exploiting them. They are arbitraging in labor in an unfair labor market in which people are not free to change national allegiances. Corporations should pay a wage commensurate with people's skills and not based on where they happen to come from, not because it makes business sense, but because it is more fair. Yes, call me crazy, but I do expect people to act outside their own self interest.
That is a totally reasonable point of view, but it's important for USA to put its foot down to prevent this from being used as a loophole to pretty much all labor laws. Pretty soon US companies would only hire foreign nationals to do their work.
read up on mens rea
People have more to spend when you put less restrictions on what they can do with their labor.
You mean, rich people have more to spend. You are perhaps morally opposed to redistributive effects of taxation, but you'll have a hard time arguing that it doesn't improve the spending power of the poor.
You got things confused. Government is supposed to act in the interest of all citizens. Businesses act in the interest of their shareholders, not the typical consumer. Sometimes these interests align, and sometimes they don't.
You don't personally know a good representative sample of people.
Exactly. To generalize an attribute to sex is sexism, because people aren't average. If we need strong people to be firefighters, then should we require that firefighters be men? No, because we can simply require people to pass a strength test.
And how does the most metabolically active female compare to the least metabolically active male?
Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer