More likely it'll cost the plaintiff twice of what she earns in her lifetime.
Lenovo is a rich company and the court is in the US; she doesn't stand a chance of winning.

You mean "slippery slope fallacy drugs"?

It's a movie. It's message was "Give us your money".
Any message beyond that is just to get people to give their money more readily.

Who says they didn't get that compensation?
When the employees signed the contract, they sure as hell thought it was sufficient compensation.
This isn't some non-compete for a totally different joy; these employees are basically doing the exact same job, but at a competitor.

This is one company suing another company for not having to invest in plain employees to make them look attractive to another employer.

I guess that's Carnegie-mellon's luck then, that they're unlikely to get sued.
7 hours is plenty of time to both recieve multiple acceptances and send back replies politely turning them down.
With hundreds of people, there are bound to be a few.

"Difficult to install" = "Difficult to give hardware manufacturers a reason not to install".

In an ideal world where everything always works, you could easily ditch 90% of your code that deals with exceptional situations, none of that is core code.
In the real world however, that 90% of extra code isn't nearly enough to catch even half the poop the monkeys will throw at it.

Samsung's not going to care about any of that.
You should finish with "Hey look at the cool television. I was planning to buy a new one anyway, so I'll just take this one instead". Cops will be at your door faster than you can say "There's a matching soundbar too".

Yes you were. You were paid with content you wanted to see.

If he thnks government can force children upon unwanting parents, it's only fair he allows those parents to slowly and painfully kill chose children afterwards.

To be fair, The specific illustration is kinda hot: https://leonsmom.files.wordpre...

Imagine what this principal would do if God truely existed and Jezus went to this school, threatening to turn water into wine and such.

Don't be silly. This is Texas; simple behaviour cannot turn into more complex behaviour without divine intervention.

Results don't come in out-of-order. Imagine two variables, A and B, each undergoes a number of calculation steps which don't refer to the other variable. I.e. A=A+5/2*13-29 and B=B*B*3+12/N, then finally adding them together as Z=A+B. Normal execution would first do all the calculations for A then all the calculations for B, then finally Z. Out-of-order execution would calculate both A and B simultaneously, wait for both to finish, then calculate Z. Out-of-order execution involves a lot of this type of waiting, but since it's waiting for just the slowest calculation instead of the sum of both the slowest and fastest calculation it ends up being done sooner. If things cannot be calculated like this, an out-of-order capable processor will simply do things in-order.

At least that's how I understand it at a very abstract level.