One the other hand, this will be the end of all religious websites.
After all, I think we can all agree religion isn't factual, right. Right?

Yes, I think we can all agree the Un-Beta looks like shit.
It's quite... fascinating how a site for nerds can't seem to get the most basic CSS1 right.

Facebook has just turned 11 years old a few weeks ago.
Most people who joined facebook in their teens are no longer be teens.
How can it still be called a "teen phenomenon"?

If you seriously don't know what the moderation system of Facebook looks like, you don't get out much.
It's demonstrated on pretty much every website, on TV and radio commercials and shows. Even paper media will tell you how it works.

Go back to your hipster coffeebar and don't come out until you've grown your own opinions.

Atleast getting the delete file error is quick.

I continue to be amazed by the slowness of some other common file operations,
1. Select a lot of files and directories.
2. Drag them to another folder to start copying.
3. Wait a few seconds and cancel.
4. Wait 15 minutes while a window shows "Cancelling...", during which you can't really do anything.

Why does it take so long to cancel file copying? It has to delete a single (partial) file at most.

Hey! I've had that signature way before those books were a mere itch in their authors' belt-beaten bunghole.

Damn him for putting his money where his mouth is!

Most people simply don't have the technical skills to maintain a website, even if it is a modern CMS.
Wordpress.com has an anti-porn clause. So do pretty much all hosting providers. Those that do allow porn (usually on dedicated accounts) charge a lot more to do so.

"Be your host" is just not within reach of most people.
Even more so for adult content.

More likely it'll cost the plaintiff twice of what she earns in her lifetime.
Lenovo is a rich company and the court is in the US; she doesn't stand a chance of winning.

You mean "slippery slope fallacy drugs"?

It's a movie. It's message was "Give us your money".
Any message beyond that is just to get people to give their money more readily.

Who says they didn't get that compensation?
When the employees signed the contract, they sure as hell thought it was sufficient compensation.
This isn't some non-compete for a totally different joy; these employees are basically doing the exact same job, but at a competitor.

This is one company suing another company for not having to invest in plain employees to make them look attractive to another employer.

I guess that's Carnegie-mellon's luck then, that they're unlikely to get sued.
7 hours is plenty of time to both recieve multiple acceptances and send back replies politely turning them down.
With hundreds of people, there are bound to be a few.

"Difficult to install" = "Difficult to give hardware manufacturers a reason not to install".