I don't use OCR on a scanner all that often, but last time I did (atleast 5 years ago, probably more), it had no problem recognizing the pages full of text.
As far as I've tested it myself, OCR works great on scanners, so why wouldn't it work as well with cameras?
As a side note, take a minute to realize how amazingly good prosthetic limbs have become that using one has become an unfair advantage.
Not a network expert, but wouldn't some sort of internet proxy with caching be a simple way to help?
Other than that, the sad truth is that obsolete hardware is usually most productive when it's not using up valuable energy.
GCC had a bug that wasn't covered by their unittests.
Linux had a bug that wasn't covered by their unittests
According to Linus, only one of these two is retarded, can you guess which?
May well be, but nobody is using it to get incorrect information removed.
I've only heard of it being used to get correct but unflattering information removed.
I have yet to hear of a single case where a removal request revolved around incorrect information.
Mostly it's people who see their careers threatened by their own past illegal or immoral actions being known.
Agreed.
No more blackmail settlements, no more blanket anonymous lawsuits, no more copyright trolls.
Somebody needs to stop those freetard publishers running amok with other people's hard work.
Just to add my 2c. A while ago I was working on a project which could use data in WHOIS records. Ultimately this failed because the data is very unreliable and mostly unavailable, but I did come accross some laws.
Seems the U.S. is pretty much the only country that has a law on this, and it just says that it is illegal to have inaccurate information in a WHOIS record if and only if you're using that inaccurate information to scam people. So basically you can use inaccurate information all you want but if you're conficted of scamming people online, the use of inaccurate WHOIS information can be used to add some additional jailtime.
5 reams of carbon copy paper contains much less information than a single USB stick.
This is security by volume.
The only time an actual ruling needs to be passed is if the students can't come to an agreement. This is very rare and will usually only happen 1 in 2000 games or so. We don't need to RDIF tag all of our 16000+ tournament pieces just so that 1 in 2000 games someone who knows nothing about chess can make an accurate ruling. We'll just bring over an expert in those cases.
As an expert, what is the most difficult ruling you have ever had to make?
I'm not a chess expert but I can't imagine any situation that would actually require an expert to resolve, as opposed to somebody who just read the rules and played a couple of games once.
Are those petabytes compressed or uncompressed and if compressed, at what quality?
Would they keep the recordings real-time accessible or on backup media?
Petabytes of uncompressed telephone-grade audio would boil down to less than one backup tape a day easily.
GP implies stopping the drugs was the direct cause for the relapse.
The CNN article states the child was initially "functionally cured" a few months after stopping the drugs.
The facts us readers know, indicate neither correlation nor causation between stopping drugs and the relapse.
Which is why there is a growing movement of scientists who promote publishing failed research results.
Scientists, out of anybody, should know that failure is when you learn the most.
Name me any language without bad parts.
I've used several dozen languages so far; every single one of them had bad parts.
I've tried knockout.js and I really like the style of programming; I just haven't found any practical use for it beyond very basic single-page web apps which would be just as easy to do without MVVM.
Without life, Biology itself would be impossible.
