Their DAR.fm thing is also neat.
I hope this means they'll be able to ramp up the service now, as their support sucks.
Now, if the Tab had come $100 cheaper and offered me something MORE than what the iPad2 does, I would be all over it. But for the same price it's just not worth it to lose the ease of use, interoperability, and application support. Exactly. It's not enough to match the ipad, it has to be CHEAPER than the ipad to be worthwhile for normal people. Not meant as flamebait, but I believe Android would never have gotten as popular as now if the iphone hadn't been limited to one carrier and priced higher than the android phones in the USA.
What about the Asus Transformer? It is $400 (equivalent iPad 2 is $500) has the internal memory, a dual core tegra chip, same gorilla glass ips screen, etc. It also has Flash, you don't have to use iTunes, and there are a lot more apps/options in general than iOS. I have one and love it.
He used proprietary software to get the GNU project up and running. First thing he wrote was an editor, then a compiler using that editor, then tools using that compiler and editor, then more tools using the existing tools, compiler, editor, etc.
> Another thing that bothers me is that the FSF stuff almost comes across as negative, so 3DS is evil, iPad is evil, Kindle is evil, etc. Great, but what hardware is actually ok to buy? Why is there still no hardware database of the good stuff that doesn't limit my rights?
But Google is distributing proprietary software!
Like all proprietary software distributors, we want them to stop and release free software instead. That's why we take up the argument with them.
You know that Free Software is about freedom and not price, right?
But this is Google's code that its running on MY computer. I should be able to control it.
The code is already in your browser and you can already look at it. That's not the issue.
The issue is that without the essential freedoms to study, modify and distribute copies of the software, users are at a disadvantage to the developer and that's unjust.
Because users aren't able to legally modify, study and distribute it? Plus, it's not in a suitable form for modification.
You think the FSF should prefix all of its opinions on its own website?
Psst, here's a copy of Facebook's secret code -- http://static.ak.fbcdn.net/rsrc.php/v1/yp/r/Ub2OCc5xWCb.js
HELP!!!! I'm being held prisoner in /usr/games/lib!