Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:That's fine but... (Score 1) 858

Please feel free to reread my post. I did not say that Apple is catering to the lowest common denominator, I said that Apple has chosen non-upgradeable computers as their lowest common denominator.

I also don't know where you get the idea that Apple is selling a $2200 laptop as the best fit for most consumers. Apple's best sellers from my perspective (retail Apple salesperson in 1/2 million strong metropolitan area) are the $999/$1299 MacBook. The 1st two MacBook options easily outsell the more expensive models 5 to 1.

Could Apple sell more computers if they offered a wider variety of options? Absolutely. But one of the great things from our store's perspective about the limited options available is the fact that we can keep every combination of processor and video card in stock and change the RAM and HHD to the customer's specifications. It allows us to send >90% of our purchasing customers out the door with their computer in hand.

Comment Re:That's fine but... (Score 5, Informative) 858

Why can't they offer the equivalent hardware of an iMac in the shell of a Mac Pro and meet the halfway point in terms of price? That would be the sweet spot for me.

Because Apple stopped catering to people who upgrade their computers a long time ago. The vast majority of consumers never upgrade a single component in their computer, and that's the lowest common denominator that Apple is appealing to. This means they can save cost and increase margin in a very competitive market.

I'm sure I'll come across as a Mac apologist, but it's the god's honest truth. I would love a mid/low powered expandable desktop, but it isn't going to happen anytime soon.

Comment Re:Don't forget the new keyboard (Score 1) 519

While I can still see the advantages of a numeric keypad for spreadsheet or accounting use, I think it makes a lot more sense to use a physically separate pad. With a detached pad, you can put the alphanumeric keys and mouse much closer together (and put your arms in a more natural position). The numeric pad can go in a more sensible location off to the side.

This was honestly the point of my post. I spend an above average amount of time in Excel and Numbers. I am more than willing to admit that the average user probably does not spend enough time using the numeric keypad to make it a mandatory feature, but at the same time I'm hesitant to agree that the standard keyboard should be sans-keypad.

The reason why I am hesitant is from my own personal observations at the local Apple Reseller I've worked part-time for over the last 4 years. When the Apple bluetooth keyboard dropped the keypad, there was a sizable number of people who declined the wireless upgrade due to the lack of a number pad. Our store has mitigated that by stocking up on the previous generation of apple bluetooth keyboards (in the white crumb catcher style), and those sell about 3:2 over the new keyboard to this day.

I'm probably a little hypocritical here since my argument against a mid-range upgradeable tower Mac is the same as yours against a keyboard with a number pad; not enough people would use it to make it worthwhile. Apple has been pretty good about these decisions in the past (i.e. floppy drives in 98), and they're probably right about this too.

Slashdot Top Deals

An authority is a person who can tell you more about something than you really care to know.

Working...