Are you suggesting that they shouldn't bother?

You've got to start the conversion to 100% electric somewhere, plus the transition to renewables can happen in parallel.

Someone should be tried for a crime in the country the crime was committed on. That's why the extradition figure exists, otherwise there could be universal impunity to any crime by just running off to the neighboring country.
A hacker doing its thing in the pentagon has committed a crime in US soil no matter where the hacker's physical location was at the time. The object of the hack is physically in the US, thus it's fair for the US to ask for extradition (and for the UK to deny it). On top of that, his actions might be illegal in the country he's committing the crime from, so the hacker could conceivably tried and charged twice.

Fair play, but you can't subdue a country on submarines or airplanes, you need infantry on the ground, and the obstacles for this to happen in Britain were too big, hundred fold as compared with France with direct ground access - it would've required the anihilation of the RAF and the navy first and not in parallel.

The difference is that the germans appeared all over france in full strength, that is, by both air and land and from a closer distance to "base" so to speak. The british pretty much had to deflect "just" (as if it was easy anyway) the luftwaffe to defend themselves due to tanks not being that good at swimming. Hardly a fair comparison.

While you're technically right, you're somewhat wrong. The law allows this by omission. "Copia privada" only applies if you make a copy from legally sourced media. A film downloaded from thepiratebay is not legally sourced media, nor is it illegal either (see my second paragraph). What the law states, on the paragraphs of it you copied, is that in the case of the user making a copy of their bitchney spears CD, the user is not obliged to pay extra to the copyright holders if there's no profit to be made, and within this they can play the copy to their heart's content or pass on the copy to someone else. I believe they call this "fair use" in the US.

Those two paragraphs create a loophole. I can copy my DVD and give that copy to someone else, this person obtained the copy legally so they can make a copy for someone else ad infinitum (eg p2p). Since all copies have to have an origin on an original DVD/CD/whatever their owner made a copy of, the law allows basically people to download with no limits but it does so not explicitly.

The exception seems to be recordings (ie cinema recordings) as in that case the origin copy was made illegally. There're probably a few more cases as well.

That's not quite true. It's not exactly legal nor illegal, in any case there are no enforceable consequences on doing so. Unfortunately our government is so weak loads of interest groups have lots of leverage on it, including SGAE yes but also independentist political parties. The ministers are notoriously incompetent, especially the newly appointed culture ministry. Worth noting the minister is a movie director and has many ties on different pressure groups linked in one way or another to the SGAE.

and getting laid.

That's obviously true, what surprised me is they forgot something else which is complementary and equally important when measuring exercise effects: YOU PUT ON MUSCLE. Body weight is totally irrelevant when it comes to slimming down. Body fat percentage is what's all about. As you exercise you damage your muscles, they repair themselves and strengthen by getting bigger and denser. Fat density is very low as compared to muscle density. You get slimmer and lose little weight. It can happen that you actually put on weight, although this happens only as you get closer to your healthy body fat percentage range (which for men, for example, is between 10% and 15%).

I am a power user and use the CLI all the time regardless of the OS.

That's because windows's CLI is shite. I have Bash on all machines I have access to for exactly this same reason.

In all honesty I could get away without using the CLI at all, but it's been far too many years using it... many tasks are far quicker to get done on the CLI in any operating system I've used. The windowed interface allows almost the same level of control over the OS, and it's just easier to grasp for non power users. But not more efficient.

A good environment will cater for both power and non power users. Linux-based machines do exactly that for me, that's why they suit me. Windows + bash through cygwin is almost as good and it's what I use at work.

Only the one you carry within.

The parent. As I said on another comment, blades are designed with a balance, individually. Plus even if you managed to put the thing on all the blades without altering both their individual balance AND the balance of the whole apparatus (which is what you mentioned), the resulting monster will be heavier thus spinning slower thus generating less power.

The whole idea is laughable. Wanna go ahead with it, put a machine on a shed, end of story. Don't touch the turbines.

Please read the parent post. He mentioned "blade". Individual blades are balanced. It's not just putting one radar each, the blade itself will be out of balance.

Dude, last thing you wanna do is to introduce instability on a 4m long blade by adding uneven weight.

That's what cubic football stadiums are for.