Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment "Is This News"? (Score 2) 206

Well, no, it's not really news that when you tell TWC or Comcast you're bailing, they will dig out "promotions" to keep you.

I would be very suspect of the claim from the Customer Service rep that the bill will only go up 5 or 10$ per year, though, that's not my experience.

I do think that the $70 or so the OP is paying for Internet and phone is still too high, unless the Internet is wickedly quick. And seriously, the IP based phone that he is still paying $30 or so for is WAY too much.

Power goes out, Internet goes out, phone goes out. Spend that $30 on a treditional copper-wire line for 911 and such. Otherwise, why would you need more than your cell phone? IP phone service is WAY overpriced.

Yes, I know, after the copper wire hits a switch of some kind, it probably gets routed over IP anyway, but at least with copper wire to your house, you almost always have a dial tone, hence 911.

Comment Re:A vision of the future (Score 2) 56

A complete automatic milking system which lovingly cares for each cow? Maybe 30 years.

Almost fully automated dairies are already a reality, systems in place that allow the cow to enter into an automated system when it feels the need to be milked, the finds it's way to a system of machines that disinfect the teats, milk the cow, send it on it's way. There are automatic massage / scratching machines, systems that robotically clean stalls... Seriously, most people don't realize how automated dairy science is. 30 years? It's already here.

Google it.

Comment Re:No success (Score 2) 97

For those that did not RTFA:

Virginia Tech is submitting a patent describing the naming scheme. Vinatzer and his collaborator Lenwood Heath, a professor in the Department of Computer Science in the College of Engineering founded This Genomic Life Inc., which will license the invention to develop it further.

Comment Re:Why do they always make grand inaccurate claims (Score 1) 149

Wait, wha?.. How does that even work? Got pointers on further reading about that? Should be an interesting read.

I should have been more specific: The under-cover cop encourages the perp to hire the under-cover cop to kill the spouse. Quite common with these sorts of crimes.

Comment Re:Why do they always make grand inaccurate claims (Score 2) 149

Still, law enforcement is breaking the law when they create crimes to arrest people for.

It happens all the time, the best example being the "To Catch a Predator" type stings. Law Enforcement create a situation, a honeypot if you will, and waits for the flies. Fake pawn shops for fencing stolen goods is another example. Cops have also been known to encourage murder-for-hire in domestic situations like messy divorces.

But like this Bitcoin thing, "entrapment" is not legally defined the way most people suppose it is... In criminal law, entrapment is when a law enforcement agent induces a person to commit an offense that the person would have otherwise been unlikely to commit. They seem to get around it by supposedly providing opportunities to walk away. But like a fat person in front of a table piled high with Little Debbie's, it usually works out for the cops...

Comment Re:We are also getting snubbed by Slashdot BETA (Score 1) 578

From Bruce Peren's http://technocrat.net/ ...

You've reached a web site owned by Perens LLC. We are moving to new servers and thus the content you expected isn't online yet.

To reach Bruce Perens, email to bruce at perens dot com, or phone +1 510-4PERENS.

Hot topics as I write this: Why doesn't Bruce resurrect Technocrat.net now that Slashdot is owned by Dice.com and stinks more than the last two times I've shut down Technocrat.net due to lack of readership? And while we're at it, we need to replace Groklaw.

Think it would really work this time? You've got my email and phone.

Comment Re:Bruce is not reliable for hosting. (Score 1) 93

Perens shut the site down because there was not enough traffic to support it.

From http://technocrat.net/ ...

You've reached a web site owned by Perens LLC. We are moving to new servers and thus the content you expected isn't online yet.

To reach Bruce Perens, email to bruce at perens dot com, or phone +1 510-4PERENS.

Hot topics as I write this: Why doesn't Bruce resurrect Technocrat.net now that Slashdot is owned by Dice.com and stinks more than the last two times I've shut down Technocrat.net due to lack of readership? And while we're at it, we need to replace Groklaw.

Think it would really work this time? You've got my email and phone.

Slashdot Top Deals

Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer

Working...