Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Figures... (Score 1) 126

that a puff story about how the internet isn't important wouldn't understand how a hyperlink works.

So says an Anon Coward.

I've been reading about how "dead tree" books and radio were "buggy whips", and by now the Internet would have eliminated both.

At the same time, I want to know where my flying car is...

Comment Re:A Big Money Pit of Dubious Value (Score 3, Interesting) 169

University and college kids might want to keep the book forever (such as a good math book or a book on timeless algorithms).

You bet I want to keep a book I pay $200 for. Many of my basic references are fro college. This is not such a big deal for grade school and high school.

And for me, I find that I can find and absorb material faster and better with printed references. Indeed, when I buy an technical ebook, I immediately print it out and put it in a ring binder (thanks, boss for the copier) ...

Comment A Big Money Pit of Dubious Value (Score 4, Insightful) 169

Ed-Tech vendors' so-called "weapons of mass instruction," argues Beyer, may show "gains" on the high-stakes tests because they mimic the targeted test format, but the learning gains don't necessarily transfer to the real world, or last much longer than the end of the school year.

This has long been a problem with "standardized tests", schools teach only to the test because their jobs and budgets depend on high numbers. Thinking and teaching outside the test? Not allowed, hell, we already don't teach proper handwriting anymore.

We should absolutely be teaching technology in schools, starting with real actual math and reading comprehension, moving on to both software and hardware and other types of technology - I'm not a teacher, who knows... But like the house with an operating system, I think many of these new computer teaching tools are simply companies looking for ways to squeeze money out of people for things they don't really need, and if the government is paying for it, you know they paid a whole lot for it. Are we just fattening some venture capitalist's pocket with this stuff?

I'm on the fence about the textbooks themselves being on tablets, maybe that makes sense. But if we are going to hand off teaching to computers, why pay for anything more than a human babysitter - or is that what we are doing already?

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...