Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment GOD DAMNED SLASHDOT!! (Score 1) 12

The fucking thing looked fine in preview. Why in the HELL does it look fine when you preview it and then look like shit when posted?

This is really amateurish, slashdot. FIX YOUR GOD DAMNED CODE!

My apologies to fans, there's an unfucked version here, where preview actually matches what it looks like when you post it.

Get your act together, slashdot, and fix this ugly fucking mess. This should be an embarrassment to you, but I guess Dice is unable to express that emotion.

The next mcgrew journal will simply contain a link to a site that is less retarded. Yes, slashdot, I'm pissed off. FIX YOUR BROKEN CODE or I'm gone!!!!

User Journal

Journal Journal: Time flies like an error 12

The breakthrough was not in physics itself, but in mathematics. The new insights led physicists to see physics in a new light, and it wasn't long before they were experimenting with the equations, which seemed to indicate that it might be possible to instantly transport an object to anywhere in the universe.
It was a quarter century before a machine using the new understandings that actually did anything at all had any result, and the result was completely

Comment Re:Welcome to the free market (Score 1) 242

Don't charge $500 per game for a family to go.

For an NFL game, any seats but nose-bleed, that's low-ball.

I gave up my Seahawks season tickets and instead bought a huge TV for my basement "Man Cave", and a subscription to see the games I want to see.

Never again will I get raped by the live seat price, though Comcast (or whoever) will still rape me to a certain degree.

But with Comcast (amazingly) I don't get fucked up the ass as much as with the NFL at a "live tag team match" on the field.

- Jake

Comment Re:There Ain't No Stealth In Space (Score 1) 470

You're claiming that the Laws of Thermodynamics are straw men.

Physics shows that you are wrong.

No law of thermodynamics defines "stealth" as "perfect undetectability". You do. I don't (nor does the rest of the world). Please come up with a real argument rather than this fallacy.

You can when there is a planet between you. That is why stealth works on Earth.

A planet doesn't make you undetectable. After all, I can just send a sensor around to get line of sight and now, you're detected.

Who said it had to be perfect? I'm pointing out that your exhaust will be radiating heat in all directions. Over billions of kilometers. Maybe trillions of kilometers.

You do on numerous occasions. I can quote them, if you'd like your nose rubbed in it.

Also, your heat radiation above stops being radiated only when something intercepts it. That means there's no real limit in any direction that is black sky. Even I get that. Interception of radiation by intervening bodies is not how I propose to get stealth in space.

No you have not. You just keep repeating that it will.

That's because I already explained it. Gas expands and the motion of the molecules in the gas become highly correlated (basically the random motion of the relatively dense initial plume transforms into outwardly translation motion of the shell of a sphere or cylinder of the expanding plume at later time). That cools the gas off quickly right there. Meanwhile the increased surface area of the exhaust plume radiates heat out more efficiently.

Also, and this is a really obvious point I shouldn't have to make, the thermodynamics of an exhaust plume are vastly different than for the universe. It's a near point source which is dumping heat to a 3K heat sink while there's no outer edge to the universe to dump heat. Nor does the exhaust plume have gravitational collapse and the resulting stars and quasars to heat up the universe. And the exhaust plume expands rapidly in seconds while it took almost 14 billion years for the universe to expand to its current extent.

Comment Re:Canada needs to up their game (Score 1) 40

Can only speak for myself and my experience it tasted bad. And i like natural stuff, i make my own sausage,Kielbasa,pickles, a lot of stuff. Its a lot of work but the payoff is great. Not going to lie though i love sweets i love processed syrup 1000%. I know a lot of work goes into making real maple syrup but i don't like. it life goes on

Comment Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi (Score 1) 258

It's worth noting that some if not most people who are infected with a normal flu are asymptomatic. The H1N1 flu apparently had an unusually high rate of asymptomatic infections. For example, this report implies infections were at least a factor of three higher than symptomatic infections due to the increased presence of antibodies.

Comment Re:I feel like we are living in an 'outbreak' movi (Score 1) 258

Wait... are you prepared to acknowledge that some third world countries have better health care systems than the US?

Because otherwise I don't see how which third world country is relevant.

What's the point of this grandstanding? A claim was made. Back it up. Name the country that is mentioned in this statement: "In contrast, in a third world country with a decent health care system, the infection rate was 1 in 1000."

Note that Europe didn't have significantly different infection rates than the US.

And health care systems are relevant because that's how you educate people about transmission vectors and what can be done to prevent spreading the disease. When your health care system is almost disconnected from the government by design, then your public education campaigns do become a lot more difficult, because instead of a single coordinated effort, you end up with a myriad of private entities all communicating something slightly different. Right now, in Texas, people think they can get ebola from watching news about the case. You cannot get more disinformed than that.

You do realize that there are public health services doing public education campaigns in the US? Your premises are wrong.

Comment Re:Stupid move, celebrity (Score 1, Interesting) 225

"Google sites like BlogSpot and YouTube four weeks after the firm ordered them taken down."

Um Google owns the Blogger site so ya they are hosting the images. So they are making money from the images because they draw more people and that means more ads placed, more ads clicked, more ads sold. Bit of a women hater hu?

Comment Re:There Ain't No Stealth In Space (Score 1) 470

The whole point of this is that there is no horizon to hide behind in space so stealth does not exist because there is no way to be undetectable.

Here's another example of the straw man. First, a straw man argument is an exaggeration of another's argument in order to defeat that position. The exaggeration here is that stealth is undetectability which is an impossible condition to achieve under any non-fictional context (aside from not existing in the first place, eg, a "snipe hunt").

Sure, you can't make a detectable object perfectly undetectable by definition. But that never has been what stealth is about as I've repeatedly said. It's about being much harder to detect so that various militarily-useful activities can be conducted such as sneaking up on some target and shooting it.

You are claiming that the exhaust will cool to background radiation levels. That is, the temperature of the rest of the universe that has been cooling for billions and billions of years. You cannot explain how it will cool that fast.

So then you say that it doesn't have to be perfect, as long as everyone is blind. That's not stealth. That's blindness. You aren't invisible because a blind person cannot see you.

This is probably the best example of the ridiculousness of your argument. There is no such thing as a perfect detector - among other things it would need infinite area both to observe perfectly and to store the infinite amount of information it received. Thus, everyone has something they can't detect and hence, by your perversion of the meaning of "blind" above (and I'm not going to accept a definition shift of "blind", that's a lazy fallacy), everyone is blind. So as long as everyone is "blind", which is always the case, there is a way to be "invisible", making your argument pointless.

And I already explained how rocket exhaust can cool that fast. For someone who claims to have physics on their side, you aren't keeping up.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...