If it is because you hope to use lack of an ABI to force drivers to be open what do you say to the fact that the most stable graphics driver in Linux is Nvidia, who is closed?
Having used it and also used the open Radeon driver, the answer is that it simply isn't. It may be the best-performing Linux graphics driver, but it is far from the most stable.
There needs to be *at a minimum* public education on this issue, and if nobody is willing to do that, then handheld lasers need to be outright banned for unlicensed individuals.
Or you could have what the UK has: laser devices regulated according to laser class. Anybody can have one of those less-than-5mW red pointers that people use for presentations, while potentially blinding brighter green lasers are theoretically harder to obtain.
It's a good system, since you can't actually harm someone with a normal laser pointer, since you blink before any damage is done, like unexpectedly seeing the sun. However, in practise it is too easy to mail-order a green laser from Hong Kong.
Move more than about 5 cm away from the card and it won't read.
Being the richest guy in the world makes you a target, whether you deserve it or not (see sept 11).
Are people still seriously saying that 911 happened because "they hate our standard of living"?
I am in no way saying it was deserved, but it also wasn't motivated by the US's wealth. Its policies in the middle east, especially the unquestioning support for Israel, are much more relevant.
Teaching ARM is the equivalent to teaching Visual Basic Programming, common but very closed architecture.
Uh, what?
No; teaching people to program C on an ARM Linux machine is the equivalent of teaching people to program C on an x86 Linux machine: the CPU is proprietary, but who cares?
The cross-compiling thing is a red-herring too; you'd just run GCC on the RaspberryPi and for educational purposes it would be plenty fast enough.
The use of money is all the advantage there is to having money. -- B. Franklin