No I meant the stuff you had produced while you were alive. Keeping it online after you were gone may be beneficial.

Perhaps from an unselfish perspective, assuming you had something to offer humanity...

Buy a Tesla, and you too will become part of the crowd which accelerates at every given opportunity ;)

It's definitely kW. Even on the following site, it mentioned the kW power limit. We're talking in terms of power remember, not energy.

http://gizmodo.com/tesla-batte...

Just to check - did you get my latest email? In case you didn't, here's the exe again which should hopefully work with your second monitor:
http://www.skytopia.com/stuff/...

Wait, did you not mean kW instead of kWh? I was only just recently moaning about that in another thread.

Just as well the EM drive still requires a source of energy then. What I'd like to know though is where the energy is going to. Is it just bouncing around inside the cavity and heating it up as a result?

I think that if this is valid, the correct theory will follow soon enough anyway, but in principle, why must we know how something works before letting it benefit humanity? Did the early caveman have a deep understanding of fire when they were roasting their woolly mammoth cuisine?

It's almost as if everyone tries to get it purposely wrong. Even tossing a coin would yield a better success rate.

It's so easy to understand. Just like "their" versus "they're".

Or is it?

For example, in a manner of speaking, I belong to the 'tribe' which promotes EVs over fuel-cell vehicles. I choose that position not because I want to 'belong' to a an arbitrary tribe, but because there are many distinct advantages with EVs, and relatively few advantages of fuel-cell cars. Do I gain pleasure by seeing the other side 'humiliated' or 'defeated'? Well, one of the greatest sources of humour is in imperfection. If those imperfections are true, then a certain amount of satisfaction at a technology's defeat (along with their adherents' misguided beliefs about that tech) is perhaps justified.

A similar argument could be made for direct selling (dealers versus Tesla). I wonder which side most of us would belong to, and if that's an arbitrary tribal instinct, or just common sense.

Even if you are right about latency and framerate not causing sickness, you're forgetting these are qualities we should be having anyway.

120fps looks FAR better than 60fps. And low latency games feel a lot snappier than high latency games. If that ALSO helps sickness to any extent, then that's just icing on the cake.

Do you have a source for that? I knew it was bad, very bad even, but that's really pushing it.

That didn't stop aspartame from becoming a success though. Besides, it can always be rebranded, just like blood oranges are now often called 'blush' or 'ruby red' oranges.

Does xylitol also cause the insulin response do you know?

How about Xylitol instead?