It's definitely kW. Even on the following site, it mentioned the kW power limit. We're talking in terms of power remember, not energy.

http://gizmodo.com/tesla-batte...

Just to check - did you get my latest email? In case you didn't, here's the exe again which should hopefully work with your second monitor:
http://www.skytopia.com/stuff/...

Wait, did you not mean kW instead of kWh? I was only just recently moaning about that in another thread.

Just as well the EM drive still requires a source of energy then. What I'd like to know though is where the energy is going to. Is it just bouncing around inside the cavity and heating it up as a result?

I think that if this is valid, the correct theory will follow soon enough anyway, but in principle, why must we know how something works before letting it benefit humanity? Did the early caveman have a deep understanding of fire when they were roasting their woolly mammoth cuisine?

It's almost as if everyone tries to get it purposely wrong. Even tossing a coin would yield a better success rate.

It's so easy to understand. Just like "their" versus "they're".

Or is it?

For example, in a manner of speaking, I belong to the 'tribe' which promotes EVs over fuel-cell vehicles. I choose that position not because I want to 'belong' to a an arbitrary tribe, but because there are many distinct advantages with EVs, and relatively few advantages of fuel-cell cars. Do I gain pleasure by seeing the other side 'humiliated' or 'defeated'? Well, one of the greatest sources of humour is in imperfection. If those imperfections are true, then a certain amount of satisfaction at a technology's defeat (along with their adherents' misguided beliefs about that tech) is perhaps justified.

A similar argument could be made for direct selling (dealers versus Tesla). I wonder which side most of us would belong to, and if that's an arbitrary tribal instinct, or just common sense.

Even if you are right about latency and framerate not causing sickness, you're forgetting these are qualities we should be having anyway.

120fps looks FAR better than 60fps. And low latency games feel a lot snappier than high latency games. If that ALSO helps sickness to any extent, then that's just icing on the cake.

Do you have a source for that? I knew it was bad, very bad even, but that's really pushing it.

That didn't stop aspartame from becoming a success though. Besides, it can always be rebranded, just like blood oranges are now often called 'blush' or 'ruby red' oranges.

Does xylitol also cause the insulin response do you know?

How about Xylitol instead?

Nice idea. Now instead of putting in teeth-rotting sugar or another weird tasting artificial sweetener, try Xylitol. Not only is it good for the teeth and health (less than 50% calories of sugar), but unlike most or all of the alternative sweeteners, it also TASTES like real sugar. I bought some for myself to put on cereal, and also unlike other sweeteners, it doesn't have that bitter aftertaste.

I bought this one from the UK, but for the US, this one looks good.

Only a small percentage of people find trouble with it (it can have a laxative affect if you take too much for the first few days). Still 4.8/5 from 106 reviews (no 1 or 2 star) is mightily impressive if you ask me.

Hiya. according to the Slashdot 'friend' system, I think you added me as a foe. Just wondering if there was any reason or what post of mine may have triggered that.

Oh noes, but that's not creating jobs, that's losing them, which is automatically bad right?

People will grow out of the 9-5 slave-aholic mindset sooner or later I guess.