Perhaps he meant dangerous if the firework destroys the copter, making it crash and potentially hit someone?

When you talk about steel etc. in the concrete, do you mean as a mixture, or as rods/pillars of solid metal inside the concrete?

How would aluminum, titanium, or carbon fiber compare to basalt fiber rebar?

Hell has frozen over. I've been anticipating standard 60fps support on Youtube for years and it's finally come. My bitterness is gradually fading...

I wonder if existing videos at 60fps already on Youtube will be adjusted to support the feature.

Yes. That's even worse than 30fps.

I admire those first customers, because without them and the rich, the ball would never get rolling and we'd all be without forever.

Which is technically better out of Gsync and Freesync?

I agree with your ideal choice of monitor btw! Apart from the size which should be bigger, but further away. This way your eyes would be more relaxed.

One major consideration in the exact type of my new gfx card (750 Ti) was down to whether it had DisplayPort. The EVGA version was one of the only ones to have it.

Enjoy your mouse cursor and window frame moving at 30fps then, and the associated lag that will bring.

Instead we should be encouraging movement the other way - towards 120fps which allows for much more lifelike smoother motion. Youtube stuck at 30fps is a thorn in the whole online video sector.

All you had to do was check at Amazon to see the star ratings people are giving them. The Samsung's were/are at about 4.8/5 for hundreds of reviews, while the OCZ was closer to 3/5 (again for loads of reviews). I'm still amazed how few actually bother doing this simple step.

There's "ahead", and then there's "leaving the rest in their wake". As a shareholder, I'm more than a little disappointed.

Okay I stand corrected.

But very simply, why doesn't NASA ditch the rest and just stick with SpaceX instead of throwing money down the drain?

Maybe they're saving their funds to give to SpaceX instead who seem to doing things more efficiently than NASA in terms of getting us off this rock.

Did you factor in moire effects, thin diagonal non-anti-aliased lines, 20-10 vision, and entire wall-size TVs into your calcs?

If you worried about running out of TV features, try true 240fps for size (not interpolated). 120fps with fast panning shots looks much better than 60fps, and 240fps is getting closer still to life-like movement.

Even normal TV programmes have lots of sharp lines and outlines as well as high contrasting bits (e.g: snooker, gates/fences, fireworks, striped/chequered shirt, fireworks, decoration, sunset on the water, grass, crystals, specular reflections on curved objects, and of course lots of text, whether subtitles or as part of the programme). No more (or minimal) moire effects with 4k too.

With unlimited undo/redo (and saving of that), then perhaps you don't need the secondary copy. Doubt it's practical though for space/HD access reasons.