Comment Re:Case-in-point. (Score 1) 207
Sounds very much like the Parkinson's Law of Triviality
It "roughly" states that when in a committee:
If a matter is urgent, complex and of great importance - people will tend to hold their opinions back. And are happy to honour or agree with one expert advice.
However, with trivial matters - everyone will bicker for ages - arguing strongly, offering their different points of view.
Such as: What colour should we paint the new bicycle shed?
That seems to happens because the majority non-experts are now given a chance to "impress" or "control the issue". It's inferiority complex at play really. So they compete by voicing their "expert" opinion. Everyone is an expert in trivial matters, really.
I design websites. And because of that I never ever allow clients or worse committee's to dictate the design process.
So I do my thing, write, design, optimise, add pretty pictures etc. Choose the colour scheme. Make it live - and then once everything is complete - allow them to speak freely. But at least the job is done now. No waiting on what colour schemes to choose from.