Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment The military isn't a private organization (Score 1) 1219

Fighter jets aren't public. They are owned by the military. Roads are public.

Roads are owned by the government, and thus are public.
Fighter jets are owned by the military, which is a part of the government, and thus are public.

I do not need a license to use the swings at a public park or to watch a concert on public tv. I don't need a license to visit a public museum or ride public transportation.

That's all true, but there is nothing in the use of those services that could be a significant threat to public safety; driving a car irresponsibly could be a significant threat to public safety, thus why a license is required to use one.

Comment Re:The "computer system" is gmail. (Score 1) 496

I truly don't understand your confusion.
From what I wrote:

He did not have authorization to access gmail's computer system using her credentials.

And your analogies:

So what you're saying is that Google does not permit my wife to access my gmail account even though I've given her permission and the password? I think you're a bit off there. I have several clients that setup one gmail account and give all their office staff access to that account. Is that illegal according to you too?

In case you're still confused by the bolding: in one situation, the person has not been given permission to access to a system, and in both of your scenarios, the person has been given permission.

Comment The "computer system" is gmail. (Score 1) 496

Two other laws that might apply are the one that prohibits unauthorised access to a computer system, and the one that prohibits unauthorised wire-tapping.

It was authorized. By him. It's his computer.

FTFA: Using her password, he accessed her Gmail account and learned she was having an affair.

He did not have authorization to access gmail's computer system using her credentials.

Comment Re:Ephesians 5:18 (Score 1) 250

"Do not get drunk on wine, which leads to debauchery. Instead, be filled with the Spirit." -- Paul, Ephesians 5:18 (NIV)

So what you're telling me is that Paul didn't pay attention to when Jesus converted perfectly good water into wine? Man, that Jesus, what a heretic, right?

Comment Re:Tell that to to judge ;-) (Score 1) 250

Sex, for instance, is perfectly fine within the lifelong bond of marriage. However, when we use it as a source of pleasure, we find ourselves in all sorts of painful and distracting situations.

You know what puts a person in a painful and distracting situation? Not masturbating. But nooooooo, can't do that, Jesus says that masturbation is adultery: "Matthew 5:28 – “You have heard that it was said, ‘Do not commit adultery.’ But I tell you that anyone who has looked a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart.”"

As for intoxication, there are several problems. Other than the fact that you are out of control (depending on the intoxicant), you also have the tendency to get wrapped up in it and become less productive.

It's interesting that the Bible doesn't actually ban any drugs or alcohol. Hell, Jesus was such a lush that he couldn't pass a glass of water without turning it into a fine chianti. Word on the street is that if he happened upon a pretty little thing having a casual sip of water, he'd miracle it into wine as it was falling down her esophagus. Crazy! I know! But probably justifiable since Genesis says that every plant on the earth was made for us to eat:
Genesis 1:29 - Then God said, “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food.
I mean, literally, God is saying "Did I hear someone say pot brownies? Pass the plate, man."

The real problem is trying to define your life by pleasure, which is fleeting.

Dude, you live in a world in which eating shellfish is an abomination that will cast you into hellfire and that slaves are Bibically told to obey their masters. Anyone who doesn't seek out a life of pleasure before they're cast into eternal damnation is just being practical.

Sadly, I have known many people who have had their life ruined by drug addiction......and I thank God that He loves and forgives even the worst and will remove them from the things they can't leave on their own.

So God loves and forgives and will remove people from the things they can't leave on their own, yet you know people who have ruined their lives due to drug addiction? Those two sentences contradict eachother. Please spend the rest of the holiday season visiting kids in terminal cancer wards and telling them that God loves them. See how far that goes to consoling their families when the kid can't overcome the tumors that are overtaking his body. "Thank" God; I'm sure that'll go over real well.

Comment Re:1 Do for being a user (Score 1) 246

So in your world, this makes sense?

"DON'T include a clearly defined method to restore all user data, a single user's data, and individual items"

"DON'T instrument the system so that we can monitor more than just, "Is it up or down?""

"DON'T tell us about security issues." "DON'T use the built-in system logging mechanism"

Yeah, it sounds like you could do well with just one: "DON'T give advice: you clearly have no idea what in the hell you're talking about."

Comment Re:What's not to like? (Score 2) 284

If he doesnt have a large number of devices, AND he doesnt add new devices with any frequency, then adding a few address to a MAC list isnt a bad idea.

The problem is that the scenario involves a neighbor who has gone through the effort of breaking WEP; anyone using the tools to break WEP already has the tools available to see the MAC addresses of whitelisted clients, and thus can just spoof a valid MAC address.

Comment Re:Creationism (Score 1) 217

Considering that the creation story was being dictated to people who had no concept of relativity, it's pretty damned safe to assume that when they were told that an event occurred within "a day", that that "day" was the 24 hours that said people were familiar with. These people couldn't even comprehend that their pork wasn't creating maggots via spontaneous generation, and you're trying to tell me that the almighty was all "fuck those guys, I'll tell'em all this shit happened in a day cause that's just how I roll?"
god could have just as easily said "a billion years", so what's the logical choice of not doing so? As an omniscient being, you'd think he'd be, I dunno, aware of the issue this would pose to us 2010 earthly inhabitants.

Comment Re:Creationism (Score 1) 217

But these are not religious qualities--they are HUMAN qualities. People did the things above because they were human, and they wanted to, and the religion was just an excuse to do it.

Incorrectimundo! The bible codifies slavery, the invasion of foreign lands and murder of non-believers, and capital punishment toward homosexuals. The holy scripture of the 3 major religions purport the above to be the commandment of God.

Comment Re:Wait, what? (Score 0) 217

Alternately, some people claim the account in Genesis is metaphorical. Now I'm not arguing that it definitely is or isn't, but your argument seems to be that if it is metaphorical, it's untrustworthy in some absolute sense.

The book is purported to be the word of god; why is god speaking in metaphor? Why was man created too stupid to comprehend the true creation story? Where's the magic decoder ring that tells us which of the other stories are metaphor and which are not (those that purport to describe a "chosen" race; those that accept slavery as a moral act; those that enforce homophobia as a commandment)? And even as a metaphor, why is Genesis such a poor and internally inconsistent metaphor: man is eternally punished for committing an act of evil at a time in which the story tells us that man literally doesn't have the capacity to understand evil; why is the Serpent making the rounds in the Garden of Eden, how is it "paradise" if el Diablo is roaming around being all "what's up, shitheads?" Why is the omnipotent creator unaware of what's about to unfold?

Comment Re:Why make it complicated? (Score 2) 144

Linksys thing was causing a world of trouble - luckily it was set to the default username and password otherwise we might have had difficulty grabbing the MAC Address of it.

You need the username and password of the gateway in order to run: "arp -a" from a computer that's connected to it?

Comment Re:Private Certificate Authority (Score 2, Insightful) 286

A variant would work if all browser user were technical enough to download and install a browser, that is a central in house downloadable copy with that root installed in the browser.

That only works if you're also fine with local users having the privileges to install software on their workstations. So you're only trading one security issue for another.

Comment Are you seriously that dense? (Score 3, Insightful) 286

FTFP: "Any cost-neutral, or at least cost-conscious solutions out there that don't involve manually distributing your certificates and CRL to every workstation in the company? Thanks." Before snarking on the FP author, perhaps you should actually read the FP's question?

So a login script (or in a Microsoft environment, an AD group policy) that distributes the certificate automatically to each computer meets your definition of "manual distribution?"
Really? That's what you're saying? "Automatic" and "manual" are synonyms in your universe? wow.

Comment No, you're just being intellectually dishonest (Score -1, Redundant) 221

After all, it's much warmer where I am right now than it was at the same time 4 years ago. 4 years ago in my region, we had a blizzard on Thanksgiving. This year, it's about 50F. Clearly, the globe is warming uncontrollably, and since we all know CO2 emissions are causing climate change, CO2 emissions must have gone up. (No, I'm not being serious)

While you're not being serious, you are being wholly dishonest and wholly inaccurate in your portrayal of the argument presented by global-warming proponents. It's akin to the Fox News assholes gleefully commenting on the storm that hit DC last winter, stating that Al Gore had been proven wrong, because it snowed. In D.C.. In the winter.

Slashdot Top Deals

Arithmetic is being able to count up to twenty without taking off your shoes. -- Mickey Mouse

Working...